Sunita W/O Jinnappa Darur vs Shri Ananda Hanamant Jadhav Patil on 1 April, 2009

1.

WP N(3.§21§1,f2€){}'?'

: Z :
IN THE HIGH COURT GP' KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENGH AT DHARWAD  ' V

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY 01? APR3.L~~2_§_j§9~,,,/.11:  "  

EEFORER
THE HGPFBLE MR.J¥.,%fl§CE«AJf'1'J.G¥}f§;L5§L A'  

WRIT PETITIQN No.  2Qo?"'{rJymP¢}:§

BETWE-EN:

Slmita, _
W] 0 aJ1'11I1a_,ppa D.'«m:;t*',« 
Age:2§ y€:ai\$.,_.  ' g  « A 
O¢c:I~§Q:1sci3L§)}.C?_ and  V
R/0 i9?a11:ié*x{ga:oi:«-5C§1';%f)-9%.  _
Ta19k=Rfiiafii».% Dk=Si='P3éigat1m- 

 Lfiiswatjzg'  »  fl
/ 0 Jiiaziappa 

  Ag&.:12 yéazfs,
 °'Q_€C:i3tudent;"' ---------- 

Rf»; Nalndagaon-591304,

 ' "V _T'::21>1ikV:4A?:hani, }f)is15;:Be3lga12m.

 Kt1:;:1';'}'__Iir2i?€:3t3i,
 'oi Jinnappa Daxur,

Age;:9 years,
C}c:c:Stuéent,

I L" «. R / 0 Nanciagaon-59 1304,
' -- ..='Ta1u}«:;At11a11i, Exist; Beigaum.

Chandmkant,

53/ 0 Jimaapya fiaxur,
Ag&: 12 years,
Occfituéent,

R] 0 PsIa:1<:iagaon--:'T:§ 1304»,



WP N0. E215E,1'2OO7
1 2 :
TaIuk:AthaJ:1i, Distfielgaum.

Petitioners 2 to 4 am minors

By their guardian petitioner NC). 1 __    __  _
Smt.Sm1ita W/0 Jinnappa Darmr. ..;'P§:titio11ers -- _

(By Sri.B.S.Kamate, Adv.)   
AND: I

3. Sh§i.Ananda Hanamanf»J§3a&hav fiéltfl,
Age:61 yeais, Occ:AgI'icu1tfi3:¢,' _
R/0 Nandagao3:1~591304,_-------~ _ "

':"*a:uk:Athani, Dis1;; Bg1ga.;um_.V  ..

2. Shri.Jin_nappa Satteppa Darth",   
Age:37 yea;'S,V_{)cc;:'Agfieu3turé,._ '
R/0 NanVdag;;m»5=913o4',   
Taluk:AIha1§L£}ist:Beig3u1n:   , ...Resp0ncients

{By   .
 (3,[)c:sai_, "A.cz_1.?;&'s for R1,
R-:2. sad) ' V * '-

&  }§#€£iti0n«iE§"f"1ied under Articles 226 and 227 cf the
»*f3<31:;~s.tii:§1ti;::'V<3:E7 India praying to quash the impugned order

 .Qij_ ,¥2'&*  V--'?+_."}'_'_,2(}(}'}" passed by the iearfied Civil Judge

{Sr}'£)x1.)V'Af£_1ani;;in 0.8.910. 1 18/ 2005 produced at Ann&xure~»F'
a11d__etc.,_ . *  '

 petitiem. coming {:11 for pm}3m.ina1*§; hes}:-izzg in 'B'

H K   .::grm1_p, this day, the Court made: the following:

ORQPZIR

   The 1" responciezut hare is the piaizitiff. The 2*"

respondent is the defsndant in a suit ftltzd by the 13'

raspmfzfittnig for anfomamant of agreement be 8311. Duriztag the

%

WP N€3,12l51/2067

Obviously, the scope of £116: suit cannot be enlarged

for partition 01; the gmund that the appficant}. _
a deems: for partitslari and sepazate possessizmdf

Ixacidexitaiiy, it is also £0 be noticed iihat’ er ‘lass;

a consent decree.

4. Having perused the <':»1'cicV1'*,~.V_I'&V'.*:fi§1 View
that the question of V of the
p€fif3:C3I}€I'S-Elp})1iC3I1tS to for specific

performance df3fit;:;.._1r,33:;t afisef rejected.

5. §t :§s épeiz f<§1*'§}15_»Tpcf£§iti§§z1ers to wonrk out their remvtzstlies

élsewhgm. ' L

sax-

JUDGE

2*’-9