Gujarat High Court High Court

Soni vs State on 11 February, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Soni vs State on 11 February, 2011
Author: A.L.Dave,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Sahai,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/220/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 220 of 2011
 

 
=========================================================

 

SONI
HIMATLAL CHUNILAL - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 6 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
VIJAY H NANGESH for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR AJ DESAI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
UNSERVED-REFUSED (N) for Respondent(s) : 4 -
7. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 11/02/2011  
 
ORAL ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

The
corpus and respondent No.4 are produced before us by the police
authorities. Respondent No.4 is aged 27 years and is working as a
Sales Executive with the HDFC Bank. Without dispute, the corpus is
aged 20 years.

2. We
have talked to the corpus. She states that she left her parental
house on her own volition with respondent No.4 and during the
interregnum period, they have entered into a wedlock. The marriage is
registered. On specifically being put, she says that she wants to go
and stay with Vikram Pratapbhai Gohil-respondent No.4 and that she
does not want to go and stay with her parents nor does she want to
have a dialogue with her parents, at this stage.

3. The
corpus has attained majority. She has expressed her will and desire
to stay with respondent No.4, who happens to be her husband. Under
the circumstances, the petition cannot be entertained and stands
dismissed. The corpus is free to go with respondent No.4. Notice is
discharged.

(A.L.

DAVE, J.)

(V.M.

SAHAI, J.)

zgs/-

   

Top