Sampath Kumar vs Ravish on 10 November, 2010

§N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED Tms THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER,'    

: PRESENT  

TI-IE HONBLE 1\fIR.JUS'1'»A'I-C._I*3:'--1_\tI'A.tIt{. EMIL, ~.  

THE I-ION'BLE  JU$T¥CE  KmI:o.ANfvA
M.F.A.NO; :8304_ OF 2005':

BETWEEN:  _  V

1. Sarnpat1f1t.E§§;--=.1'In1%jiit:',--.'_ ' 1 t 
S/0. Ra1*r1ar_;r"1a,V" '   V.
Agedaboui 62e~s3%¢aI'9s-to A  '

2. smt. Bhafam: 

W/ofixsampath' K  .
Aged about 5Gv.ye*ars,  '

8. I\/£.S.KiranV,  _ V'
.S'tudent,VA  ~

 " . _ Aged  22 yeetts.

'' nfA;:g1pvev14;taurituNogi is the Father,

" . No.2 is~t,he:eM0ther and No.3 is the

'B_rother_ the deceased Hemanth Kumar.

A11"a:_«.%-* R/at. No.2A.

AA ' 8}" West Cross,

 "Z Mysore.

* , Raj endranagar,
 Appellants

[By Smt. Prathima.N.H, for Mylaraiah Associates)
'>'{\,\;/



near Baragur Gate near Channarayapatvn'a_l'r.on

B.M.Road, at that time, a goods van  

13 / 3435 driven by its driver at,'a""high&_  

and negligent manner cameVfrom,'Cl'iannarayapatna,_sidle' 

and dashed against the Tatarélumo  lhewas V

proceeding. On account o'f'"deceased
and others who were  Tata Sumo
sustained  admitted to the
Hospital.    Hospital at Mysore on
 to the same on O8~
10--20(li?; treatment. On account of the

untimely  deceased, they have been

  deepmrriental shock and agony and they

it  bread earner. They have no other

source ,__of income. Hence, on these grounds, they filed

V.   claim petition, claiming compensation in a sum of

  7,376/- against the respondents.

After notice, the contesting respondents more

particularly, the Insurer appeared and contested the

mi

12

three years. The appellants are entitled to dratvtgthe

accrued interest on the same, periodically.

The balance €38,200/– is 0_rdered t:c5’be’.1f1¢1é’a:sed “‘ ‘V

favour of appellants 1 and 2′, in V’

Office to draw the award:éceore1ing1y.t

Iudéé

sari
1 e hag’-§