M Nagaraju vs The Karnataka Small Scale … on 10 November, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 10"' DAY or NOVEMBER 2o_1o_i

BEFORE :

THE HON'BLE MR.Jl}STICE M0!-IAN SHANTANAGVQUQAR A

WRIT PETLTION Ng.2gg7442gi"1g Ag' 'gm-'i'_g': _ 

Bggwggn :

M. Nagaraju

S/0 M. Mariyappa

Age 67 years

No.295, St" Main

3"" Stage, 3"' Biock V
Basaveshwaranagaf'  _  _  ' 
Bangalore»-79.      A    ..Petitioner

(By Sri P.S. Maifp-a_a:ti;i,V.A'dv.,j":i'i_' O;  

Aug ;  --------  .   -  

1. The Karruataka  
Industriai 'Deve_iopment" 

Corporation !'_td.,' V.  
By  Managing" Director

 "  -Adminis--trrati--ve Office'

 »Iridi.i_VstrEai«.E's§ate
' ggR'aiaima9ari _ j
BangVaEoree"3.--O;'g:: A

 A :5. The'.4'Depiity'(3hief Manager (IES)

=.i3angaloVre-Urban-Ru ral

A   *.e..!_NVo';SPL-
R.S7 situated at Magadi Industrial Ar.eva,._Bang'ai.ore Rural.

This Writ Petition coiiifing  ;for"p_r»elim_inary hearing in
'B' group this day, the Court rn'ade.t'he folii-.ofwing. :

The petitioner foilowing reliefs:

"   na"tu're of mandamus

directing'  "No.1 and No.2 to

considerlthe'awpp'l'i.ca,tio~nl"'oi' the petitioner dated

20_,3,.200a'8' aisper iannlexure-B in so far as the
M a:[lli*}:»ti:g'dv_i'plot"beaaAring'=.g

No.SPL--R--58, Thus, this writ:"*petition--.'is.filelciwforl the V

aforementioned reliefs.  V g V A

2. The plot beanhg'he,'stp§L§'R{:§.%,jjfieasuring 279.50
sq.mts. is allo.ttea'....in.:Vot"_:'.._onel§'lVir.V.Mahendran,
proprietor of on the very day on
which the..p.etit'i'o,ner1::was'-,al'lo'ttéed"'~plot bearing No.SPL~R-58.
On the very «_d'ay2,'Zl)09, allotment letters were

issued to the_ tipetVitio.nrer".as well as to Mr.V.Mahendran.

VPursuan;t' tozthe al'iot.rnent,letter, possession was handed over

:"~.i,n'Vfa*voKdr of:Mr:.:'v!,i}4ahendran in respect of plot No.SPL-R-572

Lea'se-cL=n1'=vS"'a.le vAg'reement on outright sale basis was also

' Vvlexecuted in_"hi-silfavour in respect of said plot on 19"' March

 _'The'*same was registered. The copy of the registered

 'deedfls produced along with the statement of objections by

in'tn~e...respondents. From the above, it is clear that plot

PW

No.SPL–R-57 is aiready attotted in favour V.–of

Mr. V. Mahendran. The possession is deiivered and the’:

Deed is aiso registered in his favour. Thereafter,*i.’:t’his.owrit ”

petition is filed on 29.6.2010. By the:t’ir’ne-

came to be flied, the plot No.SPL-R-57 §«as«A.Ahainded,ApAov.er.

registered in favour of Mr. V.Mahen*d_rang. T.hus,’the’-.:pr’a:}fer” as
sought for in the writ petition can.n’ot~..”be”granted;vi.navsmuch

as, the writ petition has becotme’inrr.uE:t:uous:§ –.

Accordingty_{ i_the;1irvw_rit.V”petition .:_’is._va’r’fsr.~:.r7ssed as having

become infructuo«.us’;:.. it

Tudde