Ex.)
MFA FILED U/S 1173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 22/O6/200$ IN
NIVC 330.196/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE:
JUDGE {SR.DN) 82 MEMBER,
RAMANAGARAM. PARTLY ALLOWING THE'. Cmgim }?>E:':"iT'i£>_:\_;
FOR COMPENSATION AND seexege EN£imeC;:éryi'r:N:Ij Q_F'~.
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON Fee; §::2AR1Nd}ni:s._VV
DAY, KEMPANNA J., nELNe:_1~§Ei._p "me F'0LL:§wf1§:QV::
JWMUDGMENE
This appeal eeeking for
Enhancement efv of the
injuries that took
place JQ_n__ on Vandaraguppe
_i1'n}:e1x'1n:g the motor eyeie bearing
Regn.NeZ'I{€{\~O5¥}:{';";z'V.j5 by the first respondent
an»d:e:.inS'L1red second respondent at the relevant
' p'c~i_1fn ..Qf~1Ei1<\:;e; __
'Tribunal by ixie impugned judgment and
.Aa:warzdx.da{ed 226.2905 has awarded total eernpensatien
' '~_V<:;f--%"L(}1,C}€}Q/» under various heads with interesi ai 6%
" frenl the date ef the eeiiéien iii} reaiieaiidn and
fdfihee saddied éhe §§a'%:::iEi%:y G? gagzinené Q?
*1
Q41
Compensation on the second resp0ndent~insu-tatxce
eempany.
3. The appeiiant»e}aimant being
quantum of Compensation is in zififjeai bef0re_tti.i$ V<:'(}t;1I't';';
4. Sri.S.P.Shanka:r,_ 1ea1*n__e'd__ ser1 i_o:"~ e<)@11*1sei~.VV
appearing for the appellanteleiimant the V'
Tribunai has erred eémrfiéensurate
compensation to the heads despite
the claimant"'A;».t:}1}atrt;i1g§; evidence
supporteift itzfttzer submitted that it
has of the claimant for
awardytfig 'juet towards loss of amenities
and -it has .,r1ot7' axézartied any compensation towards
fVu.'t't1re7" tees of income. Therefore, a Case for
.e':1_h:i.1*ie:e.:f1e3E};t.-i's made out.
~. Fer eontra, Learned Cotmsei appearing for the
»eef1festing«insurer supported the impugned judgment
end award paeeed by the Tribunal.
.5. Taking the rivai eubmiseions into eej:e'isi<iera':52'§_)r1~e
and the papers that are made avaiiable,~*:h4§?if.peirfJt_that--,
3.fiS€S {Of Gill' COI1Sid€I"8i§{}11 1S2
'Vfhether the appe11ar2t_--e1aii:1A2:1i1t hae'V."rrfra'de
Case fer enhancement?'
6. Facts
are elaimant having
met with a.C(:id@1)1t§ :{_reVetment that he
has taken. in dispute. It
is the___eeze.eV
Having determined his ineein’eV:_at_» the
claimant would be of ?20,000/«
[$4,000 X 5) tewarde_._.less {hiring iaidaip
period.
The be considered is what
is be awarded towards
futurevviiolsss Cf evidence on record? more
partieL1iai*Iy.i of V medical officer, reveals that the
eiaiiiiiiagnit has eiisteined permanent physical disability of
‘limb to an extent of 60% and permanent
e[is;’éLE:*>i1ii:«}.,ifiii/;w.e:; an extent of 20% to the whole bedy.
Aeeepting the sarnes as his income has been determined
A ~ as he is aged 24 years, the multipiier that
‘becomes appiieabie weuid be $8 and therefere, taking
all these faefi/ere imie eeneideraiieii, we are ef ihe ‘view
ihai, the eieiinziirzi is entiiiieci to as sun} ef ?i,?2iSG€)/~
\ 7/
3
(34,000 X 12 X 18 X 20/100) towards 103$ ofVf:1 ture
i}T”1C€)1’fl€.
Thus’ the claimant in all would be €90′
sum of 33,42,800/~ with inter6§e1:éit’6§r€’q
date of the petition till realisatiofi.
with interest at 6% p.a. date” of paetittion 1:111
realisation awarded Hvenhaneed
compensation eomes at 6%
p.a. from til} realisatien.
Aeeerdinggyff efieeeed in part.
foregeing reasons, we
proceed fee’
{DRDER
A ” -. is allowed in part.
A 2) impugned judgment and award of the
TI;ibu,f18} is modified and the
V appellant/claimant is awarded enhanced
compensation ef ?2,4§_;8C10/ fl with interest at
6% per annum frem the date ef petiiiorz till
realisaéiiezz ever anei above tfze eempeesaiien
évhei hag ‘Seer: avzarcieé ‘$3? ihe T§f§31i}”}E3§.