High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Lakshmiprasanna W/O P … vs P Sathyanarayana @ … on 24 May, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Smt Lakshmiprasanna W/O P … vs P Sathyanarayana @ … on 24 May, 2011
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And H.G.Ramesh
Between :

L

 'V V'  . { éH:i;.S ;'~31&1Sht:*He:'1§éi;""Z'iVfiv. ,}

I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

Dated this the 22% day Qf Maya 201:  
PRESEN? __  _. V
THE HQEVBLE: MR.J.3.KHI:§~£AR, <:1~:IEF%.;;f:§S1:§'i§i5j33';-T'  ~
AND 1. .. ,, 'V  _ V '
THE HGEXVBLE MR.JU$i:*::f:é«:' fig'.-4RA;1v:_%;fs2»:   L.
W'? No.10:31*:';2o06;":{{3z~;%<A}:<:é:s§m;;   

S1111: Lakshmiprasanna  '
W/O P Sathyanarayana A835" 
Sathyanarayanahéazi,  A 
Aged Abaut 32 Y€.2i'r':?:~, - ' L  _
R/O Near Adrasha Theatre; 1 _ _
Chintharnam' City:5I63 -- 225;' 
Kala:       
Karnataka Sié1te.~. W 

Smt Siiobiaa   V "   '
W/O Eziiji U C?:_ha:i:i'1'aSh§:k3Q:*','7 
A/A'--2~I     
B:/O Eéhiwfarapga  

Rffi) Near ChmjCi1..  
Ver:}:atag_iri.§{o:g§v,. " ¢_
Chinfhainani cm; 5.615' 125,

I-{ialar Di;:«1;ria::,v"K01:1r."'

' '   Petitioners

 ;'§nsii":_  *

1;.

 Sat§i§féf:é.ra3rana alias Saihyanarajganachari
__ A/A '34,--'§r"ea:'s,

S f C331 Atiinarayanachari
R;'7§L'=" 300:' N9. i9~3~446,

AA ' ._BE1ava:ai Nagar, (Did Tsvm,

3*»

* . _ _;§z13.ta§ur,

Anéhra Pradeghg

Sr: fihaxiérashakar

S/{I} Sr}: Ve:1§:a:€:si::a?arL:§u
AXE 3% 3:'$a:*§,

REG Fiai I%§Q.383, E§,§vI.'"§i E~E§§:~3§
J .?§.fE".{}.C. Kaeiiuttapaiéi
Hyéfirabaé ?'2,

fiyzdiéra Fraéeshg



  M§""'V"'*~"%b 2

  t:V§$';Kms:I3Ai§,-lo.J. (Oral) :

1 

2
 State ofKarhatali:;1
Represented by its Seitretaryt
Department of [law and Parliamemary
Affairs' Viclhana Soudha.
Dr. Amheclkar Veedhi,
Bangalore 580001.
4. Union oflndia I 
Represented by Secretary to _ .
Law And Parliamentary Affairgf 
New Delhi MG 001 " VA .V 2 _ L.
    I  l"<esj:ondei1ts
{By Smtlvlahi Garg' Adv. for' S:*i.l'{a_lya._n Bag-zzvéxréxj, ASG/
Sri H C Sundareshl CGQ for R-fl; , "  "  
Sri Basavaraj liareeldyp __P':'*l. GA for R-f3_'»., 
Sri KR. Mukunda Rao, }'x:l\¢.l :'¢,~:_  l7} 2 

This Writ l?e'tiVtion;1"sWIile.el ui:.gi'e_1* Aftteles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of  p":iaygi1';g" to=<;llreet__tlfiie respondents 2 and 3
to take H696-SSvaY}?'L$i€p'S4 to 'o.1q.itatbly.an1end section 24 of CPC, or
in the altef'nat_NeV frzime lafijpfomiate Rules under the High Court
of Karnataka '2:~.¢1:,, or a'r:y'--oth.er Act to fill up the lacunae in
relatiori mtoe..Vt'he '7:f'on's~fer of "Vfidatrimohial cases from the
ju1*is<::lL<:tion. of Co-uftttof'ofie.__S1;a:e to that of the other State and
ete., ' " " 

Thiel'*Wrivt Vl5e_tit1.oh*..eloIning on for orders this day, Chief
Jusficeoemade '-the 'follo\'ving:

ORDER

Sri.’lBa.Sava1*aj Kareddy, learned Principal Government

Adxtoeete “for respondent no.3. Smt.l\/Iani Garg, Advocate

V’ fo’f”«..o’Srll.Kalyan Basavarajl learned Additionale Solicitor

t}ene:”al of indie 5: SrLH.C.Sun<iaresh, Central *C}o:;'emmez1t

'tieooréeel for respondent f1{}.5–§.

2. Lezzshszéé eotmsel to: the §::et/ltlta:::§*:e:*:~; 5-gttatlesl that: the
pet/:i:io:/sieve will he s21t:isa;fied if the i:”:;EE ize

§;:e§§ <2? wit/l3 :5: ittlreiiétéiéh to ¥*{??f§§§'3{}§"i{§é"/l'§l, fi{}f§.§3s to 4

3
requiring them to take 21 decisiorz in the mattervV.by_t:eating

the instant writ petiticim as a repres€ntatir;m.__;””” ‘

3. Learned Cgunsel for r<:é§§o:":d<:-11.7: r;os;';3_ to"/i s":;at,eI; V

that they have no objection fer of :nSfi:é1}nv€'xx;*rit
petition, in terms csf thé ~..§1"~::1_i§,/er m_ad.€: ' Iearfié3d

counsel for tha petitigners.

4. In View of writ. petition is
disposed of %’esp~V:311dent 1103.3 to 4 to
take a by the petitianers by
as a repmsentation. A
decisiof-1 Vc’j1bfZ’.’£’1V_:é’s»3:f,}”1E3I’ be taken by the respondents
as e;q:;edi–1ELi’tmns}_*;,r V as Ap:QsSsi»LiV31€ .

rm:

§z:§ie,>z:: ‘xix’ N