" "SlNCvE"DEAAD~BzY LRs. """ *
3(.a:' M.AéD§;n.fMAJEEa ISMAIL,
--V HUDCO LAYOUT
'MYSORE_-j 570 015.
"3(b3 SHAKEEL AKRAM
_ A'{_}E'E3r'ABOUT 46 YEARS
S/'«;'3.C.l*vi.A.Bi)UL MAJEED,
.[5'.5, J.K.RESlDENCY APARTMENT,
BHEL OFFECERS LAYOUT
«~ SRK GARDEN,
IN THE HIGH Comm' 0}? KARNATAKA AT _
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY QF>_MAI§2t".2m;.--: _ %
BEFORE ' '_ 4' '
THE HOIWBLE MR. Jissiicfii' A:.~§1.ANAN1§A'.,4:
WRIT PETITION NO.
RETWEFIN: '; %A A
1.
sm M mAMEELuRAHA;sm§_ V,
S_fO.LATE K M ‘ V
AGED ABOUT 35 YERXRS. ‘ ‘ .
R/AT NO 7o9.,.m1r.3,
MYSORE I :
2. SR1 MG” i?1?AZURA}§AMAN _
S/OLATE K M Mo.HA.,MME’D_GHoUsE
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS _ ” __
R/AT NO 709,’ HIG,w.RAdlVNA{3AIé
MYSORE _ . ‘
3. (3 MAH’A:3c§oBA, ZAHRA
3332.2 A3-our 75-mans
S/O.LA’I’E C-.M;o.:1mMMED ESMAIL,
No.63 (Fm) BANNIMANTAP
BANNERGATTA ROAD
BANGALORE – 560 041.
3(0) MRS.F’AiZANA TABBASSUM
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
w ,/O.M.K,sUHA1L,
F5, JK RESIDENCY APARTMENT,
BI-IEL OFFICERS LAYOUT,
SRK GARDEN, ._
BANNERGATFA ROAD :
BANGALORE — 560 041.
36:13 MRSROSHAN ARA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
w/O.ABDuL NAUSHAD,
No.2’/4, 423 MAIN,
SANTRUPTHI NAGAR
JP NAGAR, V11 PHASE,
BANGALORE — 560 078.
3(a) MRs.IRr4’ANAVTABBAss;UM
AGED ABOUT 352Y2£;j:2’sV, . = 1
W/O.ROSHAN,.
. F5 JK RE8IDENCY:’APg!?5£MfiN€ff;~ ‘
BHEL OFFIQERSVLAYQUT, V *
SRK GARDEN; ,1: ij ‘ ‘
BANNEROAITA Rosa,
BANGALOIQE-‘~’56G041j”L«.
31:3 sx~i.suHAi’L.AHME:)A’:-zlém’
AGED ABOUT 33′ §r_EARs;, =
_ s/O.O.,~;.A3ODOL MAJEAED, _
‘R.a:,;=REsEr4{rEO~O..BY ms POWER OF
?_A’I’I’OR_’Ni3Y £101,933 AND FATHER
SRI.C..M..fi;BDUL MAJEED ISMAIL,
NO-. 68«J{H1(3r)-V ‘BAVNNIMANTAP,
HUD’CO”i.AYO{J’!’~,
Mvsoxazgz — 57~o_Oj;5.
.4; am M {EFQRTHIMA ZAHRA
_ ” v.L:;_OL.p..T_E K; M MOHAMMED GHOUSE
‘AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
“R/ArrfNO*7O9, me, RAJIVNAGAR
M’r’SQRE PETITIONERS
‘§:é;é”sfi. PRABHAKAR L swam, ADVOCATE}
‘ AND
1. SRI AKTHAR HUSSAIN
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
S/O LATE BABUJAN SAHIB
and requested the trial mart: to
to make good the deficit stamp
_ fee .53″;-‘1ri
* 4_’.I’he’ “trial éztonrt on consideration of cements of
‘ sf sale has heid that possession of the suit
VT sefiedtxle property was not delivered to plaintiff under
the agreement of sale and plaintiff was already in
R/AT DOOR NO 4/22/4,
HILL ROAD ,~
MADIKERI 5′?12o1 .. R£:sPoN1:)31sz3f_e
(By M/’S.I~IEGDEASSC’l’SFOR C/R13 _
THIS we FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 85 2:2,? c:§*..’}’r’i4%I«:…”e_ ”
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYIFl(_3’T.O QUASH THE. GREEK ‘DT.
27.10.2007 IN O.S.NO.99 OF’ 2006″e’e!?ASSEE IE3’~’!_’f’H–.’?$ PEQNCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE (JRDN) AND JMFC_MAD_IKERi, DISMXSSING THE
MEMO DT. 17.8.2007 ANNEXURE AND ALLOW THE
This petition, com.ifi$g_ an This day, the
Court, made t_11E:.fG!£l0Wii1g: ” ‘
Tifle specific perFm’mant’:e of the
agreemeifit The defendants filed 3
meme, “‘in.ter aiia. (éhnténding that the suit agreement is
possession cf the suit. schedule pmperty as a tenant
3\*°- -\ 9., x….(£L”