High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Perumakka By Lrs vs Smt Chinnathayamma on 29 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Perumakka By Lrs vs Smt Chinnathayamma on 29 May, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan
1N THE HIGH COURT OF' I{%Nfi'I'AKA AT BANTCEALGRE
Eatfid the T29??? day sf .may 2309 '
: B E F O R E I

THE Hf3N'BLE MR..3t;sT:<::_E ; v.JAGA§§:~:$::f:i;%%$¢T'  
CML REZVISEGN PE'1'r:'10:§ N9. 43"';'v----§:C#{}'9::  _ '  

ESEFWEEN :

Smt. Psrumakka, < 
died an 23?'. 199%} by LRS. 2 

1.

Sri T.<:hmmswmzy, – V'
aged 65 yaars. '

2. Sri ‘i’.SriJ’1iVas, V
Aged éfiygérs. 3;

3, VS:fit’; A V

– .

Ail”-are ::13§i1d:t*»:+:r1»- z3i’ J.atr: §v1.’I’ha32’a_ppa,
V _ £3/a }:\’I*e-:2.
. . Respondeflt

R)

Civil Revising’: Pefitien filed initial” Section 115 0f
the C1.P.C. against the Qfdfiif datad 14.112008 passed LEI;
E’;x.N’ adi11iSSiQ;ti~_:”tiaj?, thé’

cburt 111ac1e the follouférxg: _ _V
Heard I.§::ar:1tid” ‘\s’.Tarakaram

for £111-:2 13.g=3:’£\iiA9.i€}i1=e1’_§»% .r_c::spf0I1de1″1t, thcrugh served, has
remairzafié’ absééiaf’ fiéticfi i1a$ bean ham to be

st;ffiCi5I1t..

. _ f1’i3T::3. m’s;:$i0:: pefi.:i.o1:: is directed agaizzsii Em: Qrder

” pésséd {Ids executing caurt. in Executisn F530.

rajecting the prayer 0f the ;3€:*:;itio1%1er/ dficreé

” ., “11T<::–}.§i&r"' far recevmy 0f pcssfissian by isstzing Cieiivery

Z "'§§'é§.f'T311t,

The S{ZbI"I}iSSi0I'I of the learned $611101" ceunsei is

mat E3516 sxéczltixzg Court cerixmittad an €}'1"{}f in I'€"2}f§fC'§iI1g

fir

3
ma pray-’31’ cf the p€titi0:”1e:* arid saieiy 921 the gflund

that Sixaritfimnma, against whcam the dsiivazfy wamégxzt. is

sought, was mat a party either in R.F’.A. G1′ in tf;é’:’&-zfigiiiai

pr0ce&d:i.3″1gs i.6., O.S.N. ‘?4/ 1931 and

gaund that the executing c01z:*tIAA’r&j«:=:<;tL:d '__1.:rV:ay?3:r Kai' '

Th€_p€titiDIi€I' but gving iibert5;?'.f£é'–.§2a1<e §r§Ssr:sS1é3r1., ii:_u

due caurge.

4. The learmid §:i:u1:;:”.*=§éI that it is clear

fmm {E16 CO1}1};’f€)111iS§§”~8I3{x?I’€d v_ béiiiségféerz the parties

on 8. ‘igvgvigvé and 1:33,/1975 that

{3hinIiatf;g;’.y311i:1:ia..A ‘«’.%;é::3. ‘ aiiowad to ergay the suit

scti’1e:«:i:,:k_V§’ A’~’§i’ii’…”i’%*}:e1′ lifetime and thereafter, tha

v x§_:oz11§:i”r<3:::3I'"t back :0 the petiiiener. Under the:

V _ ci;4¢s;i:1§s;ta11ces, it was immaterial as is Whfithfif

.'x22.r*§1:i:izA w.§a1.S- : possessian 0f the Suit promfiy 01:33 the

riglzt Chixznatkaayanzma got ext'ing:1ished after 113:"

' ' iifétime. Therefom, tha executing court cmzld not "have

Vpasged the impugned mfisr.

5, I fmd eneugh fame in the mid submisgien mafia

by the itzarned sa aunsei and ever: thfi €X€C}.Efi1″lg

3″‘