High Court Kerala High Court

The Kerala State Electricity … vs Tata Tea Limited on 2 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
The Kerala State Electricity … vs Tata Tea Limited on 2 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RSA.No. 461 of 2009()


1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, GENERATION

                        Vs



1. TATA TEA LIMITED, A PUBLIC LTD. COMPANY,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, SC, KSEB

                For Respondent  :SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH

 Dated :02/11/2009

 O R D E R
                         THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                           R.S.A. NO.461 of 2009
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
               Dated this the 2nd    day of November,      2009

                               J U D G M E N T

——————–

Admit.

2. The following substantial question of law is framed for a

decision.

Is the suit maintainable in view of Section

14 of the Kannan Devan Hills (Resumption of

Lands) Act, 1971 which bars the jurisdiction of

Civil Court?

3. Respondent appears through Advocate Joseph Kodianthara.

4. Respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for a decree for

prohibitory injunction against the appellant and won in the courts

below. Hence the Second Appeal at the instance of defendant raising

the above substantial question of law.

5. It is submitted by counsel for respondent that subsequent

to the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, the suit

property has been acquired by the State Government for and on behalf

of the appellant, possession of the property has been handed over to

R.S.A. NO.461 of 2009
-: 2 :-

the appellant and hence the suit has become infructuous.

6. The Senior Manager of respondent has filed an affidavit to

the effect that the suit property has been acquired by the State

Government and possession has been handed over to the appellant.

In the above circumstances suit has become infructuous. What is

required is only to set aside the judgment and decree of the courts

below and dismiss the suit as infructuous.

Resultantly, appeal is allowed. Judgment and decree of the

courts below are set aside and suit is dismissed as infructuous. No

costs.

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.

vsv

R.S.A. NO.461 of 2009
-: 3 :-

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

===================
R.S.A. NO.461 of 2009
===================

J U D G M E N T

2ND NOVEMBER, 2009