IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 16989 of 2009(P)
1. SADANANDAN, USHA NIVAS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
... Respondent
2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED
For Respondent :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :19/06/2009
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
---------------------
W.P.(C).No.16989 OF 2009
------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of June, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Petitioner submits that on 30.12.2008, the power
supply to his premises was disconnected on the allegation
that the meter was in an adjacent premises. According to
the petitioner, since then he has been representing for
restoration of power supply, but however respondents
have not taken any action on the representations so made.
The petitioner says that, thereupon he has filed Ext.P7
complaint before the first respondent, which also remains
unattended. It is with this complaint the writ petition is
filed.
2. Taking into account the above complaint raised in
this writ petition, I feel at this stage, the grievance of the
petitioner will be redressed, if the first respondent
considers Ext.P7.
WP(c).No.16989/09 2
Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first
respondent to consider Ext.P7, if the same has been received
and is pending. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as
possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of
production of a copy of the judgment, with notice to the
petitioner.
(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/
WP(c).No.16989/09 3