IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNATAKA, c:Rc{111*:~'k:;13:i:1§:Lt3}§:
AT DHARWAD.
DATED THIS THE 25m mv QE»VNOVE'M'B#§R, '2%.}0g. Q ' x k
PRESENTA % . .
THE HONBLE MR.Jus'[ifIc:p K; V
THE HONBLE MR. SREERNASE GOWDA
CCC;;'No.7iD_1?7.73i1i)8.,:
BETWEEN
1. M/s...sss_ EI<éT!fER~PRISE§S-,--«......
0;? SMT;Vt}U1}a{A VIVEK, M
RE3PRESEN'}'}f3~D BY'-gim GPA HOLDER,
N.V;V1°VEKAI$IANDA-.._SV.'AMY,
S/O M'L¥RUG£3NDRAPPA,
A'&F_.D A1::;ot3'I'53'-YEARS,
~ 13AsAVEsHwA.RA:NAGAR,
% V' _ V%%'%BE':;LA_;m;f. ...co1v;PLA1mNr.
A . I ;eyam.%[%v.:myA. ADV ma SR1. K RANGVENDRA
AN11 % % %
sRr;L- c. SHIVALINGA MURPHY,
A' ' .._DIREC'I'OR OF MINES & GEOLOGY,
3 = '. _No. 49, KHANIJA B}?-IAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BANG'rALORE--560 001. FXCCUSED
( SR1. cs. PATIL AGA .)
V
ccc FILED U/S. 11 & 12 OF THE c'eN'3*EMm* OF'
eoums ACT, PRAYING TO iNrrIA'rE~ 1% j}€:c3N'reMPi* _ '
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST é_A4CQUSEJ_3_ ' "FOR I
DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED::_-'02*.11,_2'OO'7 Passes
IN W.P. No. 17402/2005.
This Appeal is "On foe day,'
SREEDHAR RAO, J., de1ive1'edm_tE31e fsfiowirsgz
This difected the
respondent for mining lease
Within i4 to pass appropriate
orders. ajhe in utter disregard to the
order, the not oonsidered the application
order. Hence filed this petifion for
. V “eeiitenjp{.
Advocate has filed an aifidavit of
“the mspoedent The afiidavit states that in View of the
‘ passed by the Division Bench of this Court
w.A.No.7s1/07 in respect of the land in question, is
fiisabled to proceed in the matter. The reasoning gven by
3
the respondent for not disposing of the application is
convincing. We do not find any gmtmd to pmceed in
the matter.
3.The counsel for the pctitkmcr submificfi:
the land in the very same village,
processed and sent to Poflutiop. Cont4z?o,Al Boa1ti
the fact that a paper pubEcatioii’=i§”‘i31ed. it is said’
that false excuses are for has
not placed material on 11:00′ VA oxder in thc Writ
appeal also appkE:¢ s’jto {fie igflvthe news paper. If
the wtfigappealv 11716′ said lease property, it would
amount t.oV”‘e:g>11tg:1iip_t b t.’ passed in the writ appeal. The
matter publication cannot be canvassed as
compel the respondent to consider the
View of the matter, the contempt petition is
% 95/’ ,
Tudge
3d/-9
Tudqé