High Court Karnataka High Court

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs T Shobha Ramanath W/O Late A P … on 26 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs T Shobha Ramanath W/O Late A P … on 26 November, 2008
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Swamy
-g fimefigm' my §(AgNA'g'Aa(A §.-figfifi ggg§t;p;.*§'« %AgNA'g'AKA RIQH €03.33? 0? E(ARNA'¥AKA HIQH GQIJRT Q? KARNWEKKA HEGW flfififlfi? OF K/ARNAYAKA iflfifi CQEJ

IN '£'H'E§ Ififil-I CGURT OF KARIIATAKAAT 

DATED ms TI-IE 245:2; ms: or novmafi"   /I }' A

BEFORE

um HOFBLE MR. JUSIICE  

& ;

THE Hormm me. JUSIICE   

 

c:m1«i*rA1. maiJs2Ant:Ef::i§.  A'  
DIVISIOHAL--.,oIefFICB,'. % X ' 

an 213 - 21?, §?H¢RrJas,
<:HAMARm3PE'It;%B£mGA1»0RE --518.
New rm-=. - 3*! EEGIOHAL WEAWR,
REGIQHAL Gxwsm, #§-M45,

LEO SHOPEPWG

    

 A-mémhma swamr, Su ARA&

Lem. w%saoa:-m nmmmm.

* «   flwm mm A P RAMANA'1'H,
» ; ~  AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

  Q2 MCI-II. R vmun,
  Tsgomm AP Raxmmm,

HCIW #1839 A300'? 13 YEARS,



3.. mm. R AISHWARYA.
mo LATE A P RAMAHATH,
HOW was ABOUT 9 mans,

um RESPONDENTS no.2 AND 3

rmmnz mica Mmom
REP.BY’1’I-IEIR mrrumu. % %
Gumnmnjuonmn mm

1:? RESPONDEHT mamas,

ALL 21:. at 39-0,, ammo mama, L
mm mm, 35:»: cmss,

41%! ‘1’ BLOCK, JAYAEIRGAR. A A %
BAHGAIORE – 560 cm. L & * 3%

4.. mm 1 ~ A
810 ”

AGE MMfiR,..Rl-:5? a_;s25,k %

13m CRCi5?;8;. &3AIhfis.}iIVfiflAGAR,

L.173(I’3.._c’fV M.”V.Act agaimt the f and

6.4.;’E”E3S passed in MVC 110.444-1/04 on

Eh Bf Court of Small Banana 8: Mamba’,

SCCH No.9, martin ooftzion

ar§Rs;«31,35..m0I- with mum:-.@ ass p.a.
comirg an Ear order: this day, the

“* M-W'<% W KWNNAM WW"! HOW-Tjmfi MWMAM mm: CGUW W KARNNMEM HWH cmm? W MRNMAM HIGH comm 0% mmmmm Hm-5 com

19.11111!

Haa1d&'iAHKz-'slum Swnxny.

\\\/

a mum" m mnmmm Mimi mm-;$m mgmmm mm: mum" aw mwmmm mm-«a mum W a<AmA'rAxA Hum cmmw mmmmm HEGH cm:

2.. LA. 1)’2%fia3OWfl. TX 01513!’
15.1£3.200B15r~acal1ed.

3.. Th’: appeal is fihd by

queatiszanim the qtmntum of

upon the judmnt: qfthc one of
ASHA mm mwmmcn
comma? in ILR 209+
KAR zmn; mmg,u~m.;.n of has of
of the deceased as
file arm has owepmiancy 0!
mg the Insurance Company has

% to modify the nnpI.IgI:nd’ _;ua@:

gnaw laid down in Acme me
Tm said ease in no lower rm-mtg’:
hunt daemon ofthe Supsrcme court. ‘The:
ofthe hxcnme :”I by not or gross income In

. taican as held by the Supreme Court. in the east: of

H.&’I’I€)NAL BVHJRAKCE CGMPANY LTI1, VS INIERA

M