High Court Karnataka High Court

Kumari Vidya V D/O Mr R Vijayan vs State Of Karnataka on 19 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Kumari Vidya V D/O Mr R Vijayan vs State Of Karnataka on 19 December, 2008
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda
-1-

EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KY1' BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE} 19"' DAY OF DECEMBER 2008 

PRESENT

THE HQN'BLE3 MR, JUSTECEE SR. BANreuRM;x;m'A  "' 

AM)   ._

THE} HCWBLE M12. JUE5'E'I;<;= MR. R" VEJAYAN _
AGES ABOUT ;*?"{E&Rf;3_,'  _ V' "
SENSE MINOR_'RE_PRE:SEN'§EiD 'BYf-.
HER FATHER' E%;_35'EJA"f{APE   

RESISING AT N<;'§'.'A.:i9S;O,'*--._ " __
RR. LQAYGIJT, R_tJ%~:.N:?Ni-~..NILAYA,
RAMA MEERTHY NAGAE. M 
BA§sIGALORE_V~1'6.  ' '

  "  COMPLAENANT

V. R (B Y' sgéi. BEQLE. 5533;, ADVOCATE}

j 1 S'?A'§'E§ GE' I{ARNAT1'%KA
 REPFQELSENTEEIE BY CHIEF SE*;CR'i3""£'§;E«3'f
" I SUDHAKRR RAE): MJMGR
, 'a?§?f)HANA SOUBHA
'"§i§NGALQREI«»€:66 061

1 THE {3E~H'E.F' EXAMINER/BIRECTOR
PRE~¥_§NEVERSi'§'Y BOARD

:4:



BANGELORE
REPRESENTED B Y MR' FAYAZ, MA-JGR.

THE; EWEENCIPAL

BALDWEN GIRIJS JUPEEOR CCELLECEE
510.19, R'1CIiMi'C}i'{'D ROAD
BANG~Ai;OFEE«-Lfstfifi G25

REPRESENTED BY {TS ?E?§NCIPAL
MRS. LIN['}Y§1 SAMUEL, 'i'¢EA,M§O§~¥.   -

{.0

A1 DELETED VIBE COURT  _
ORDER DATED 19.8.2008 '

(3? $121' M-J ALVA, ADVOCATE mR__,_«;;i2;._   

SR2. SRIDBAR R'. HIRE7MATHV,"C+.QVER*NMEN T A13'.'§'OClATE{'P'OVR 13:2}
THIS {:00 g7* :3/:3};  1:2 0? "mg

cNTEM1=°r 012* csawfzfr ACT:3»RAVjj'N<}'--v:c::_<;;=;§;m1~«:<:i:*~% THE ENTIRE

E2g<:Av:i.551ffi?5§?  '3:'§3'I~'ifABL§""}§QT1oN AGAiNS'T THE
RES?oNm:.:m'TS mxk:.'j'v-~::ya.sr::¥:-x:;_V""::§_<:)m2;z'I*r;1x1<,: CQN"E"EMP'F (;§::g,4ac:';-;G*x%.r:TH THIS §>ETm:x:
'-Frégg.'-Tr:e::<:{::§v;:;:;"'<:{i§m1«:e3 ow F('Z2¥3 ORQERS, -mzsas DAY,

 'z3;A:~éNi;§.r2ix:;--,é;m 'J,  =§££AEf)E THE FOLLCJWING:

GRDER

 }*--'\'.'31e@1'g disobedience of the order dated

K Whereimder, the resgondents/accusad was

. difecieii to armounce the resuit Qf the

5""

  .;¥    T_ T 



-3"

peti'EioI1er/ camplaixlant who appeared for €X3,I11iI('.1af1i0}£1

by virtue sf interim order of this Court, the p;'§;$§f1t.

C/cmtempt Petitioxl is filfid.

2. 'i'crday, it is Submitted that §)f:::1*1¢ "  

dismissal of tha review p€ti;Ei0I1:'-~A zfik§€§,.A&

respondent/accused an 15.   VA

been announced on in v.i:<?:i5} 1:113

announcement of the .I'}{:sLIEt;, i_ i~s_ substantial

cQmplia1jx'C"eM 11tempt

Pr-sceedinxgs are ~ .. __ . . é

sal-

Iudqe

35/*3
Tudg’3