Nadiad vs Raysanghbhai on 22 March, 2011

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

FA/482/1993	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 482 of 1993
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 483 of 1993
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 484 of 1993
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 485 of 1993
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 486 of 1993
 

With


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 487 of 1993
 

 
=========================================================

NADIAD
NAGAR PALIKA – Appellant(s)

Versus

RAYSANGHBHAI
KISHABHAI & 2 – Defendant(s)

=========================================================

Appearance :

MR
MEHUL SHARAD SHAH for
Appellant(s) : 1,
MR GM AMIN for Defendant(s) : 1,
NOTICE
SERVED for Defendant(s) : 2,
MS SACHI MATHUR, ASST.GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for Defendant(s) :
3,
=========================================================

CORAM
:

HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA

Date
: 22/03/2011

ORAL
COMMON ORDER

Endorsement
in the cause-list reveals that in F.A.No.487 of 1993, notice could
not be served to respondent No.1, as he is reported to have expired.
Mr.D.K.Chaudhari, ld.advocate for Mr.M.S.Shah, ld.advocate for the
appellants states that necessary steps shall be taken to bring on
record the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent
No.1 and for that purpose, he seeks some time. S.O to 06.04.2011.

(J.C.UPADHYAYA,
J.)

(binoy)

Top