High Court Kerala High Court

Sujaya Kumari M.B vs State Of Kerala on 10 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sujaya Kumari M.B vs State Of Kerala on 10 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15955 of 2009(L)



1. SUJAYA KUMARI M.B
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :10/09/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                       ------------------
           WP(C) Nos.15955, 21043 & 21307 of 2009
          Dated,-------------------------- 2009
                  this the 10th day of September,
              ------------------------------

                          J U D G M E N T

In these writ petitions, the petitioners, who are working as

Workshop Attenders in the Government ITI, are claiming promotion

to the post of Junior Instructor in terms of Ext.P2, the Special Rules

governing promotion to the aforesaid post.

2. When the cases came up for orders, counsel for the

petitioners confined their prayer for a consideration of the

representations made by them to the 2nd respondent in this behalf.

3. The petitioners in WP(C) No.21307/2009 have filed

Exts.P4 & P5, and petitioners in WP(C) No.21043/2009 have filed

Exts.P3, P5, P7, P9 & P11 and the petitioner in WP(C)

No.15955/2009 has filed Ext.P6.

4. Having regard to the pendency of the aforesaid

representations, and as the petitioners are limiting their claim for a

consideration as above, without expressing anything on the merits

of the claim, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the 2nd

WP(C) No.15955, 21043 & 21307 of 2009
-2-

respondent, the Director of Training, Industrial Training

Department, to consider their representations referred to above.

Orders on the representations shall be passed with notice to the

petitioners. These shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any

rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment.

5. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment

before the 2nd respondent for compliance.

These writ petitions are disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg