High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr Vinayak Karate S/O Laxman vs The Authorized Officer Ounjab … on 5 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Mr Vinayak Karate S/O Laxman vs The Authorized Officer Ounjab … on 5 November, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNA':¢4;':§iA' "    _
CERCUIT BENCH A'IfmD>HARFJ¥!§E}.:: ,  V.

DATED THIS THE 5TH i)AY_O§«T_--bi(iV4EIv.ii3'ER; gm»

THE HOIWBLE MR JUS3=:fC8 {GML§'R"I'}

BETWEEN:

Mr.ViI1ayak..I{a:ja"_'?e, 1 2

Age: ahroutfii?     
S/oz       "
Gamanga£ii'iT%c$.3.d, '  ..  
       OK PETITEONER

(By s1?;"ma1;¢s}::- a';'?a~;§:;"'gaa§ocata)

 

   ;t"1j1Ath0:is&d Gficer,

 !§atioz1a1 Bank, 26/ 2'7,
'- __ .15" fiQ;3I',.Raheja Towers,
 M.(};R{:rad, 8a:t1ga1o:re-01.

2.' Registrar, B'i?."I'., Bangalore,
Hudson Cigmitits, Bangaloie-O1. .. RESPONDENTS

T 131$ writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of

{fie Constitution of India praying (1iI’6CtiO}£1 ciirecsting the:
respondent No.1 to (imp all recovery proceedings as against

the petitioner and regularize the housing lean account of flue
petitioner, quashsd the samic 3:1€}1Zi{2€3 issued by the
respondent bank dated I0.10.2008~«Annexure ‘G’.

This writ petition coming an for prafinlinary hearing
this day, the Court; mads the fczflowing:
Likék

mads {ha payment, it does not iznstiil coniidgiicc

91′ the Court to accept the petif;ionb:’_é1’s.v i’he 7

would make geod the amount V€?itfii11 i’£¥0 is fi10fi.t1is. L’

4. The actien of the the
auctioxz notice of t:h;€._..V:{‘;zf(§);;:31*t:’_3b,rA to the pstitioner
cmmot be faugjd faui:..m%ifi1. fellowed. by the
Bank, -axmtrxure ‘G’, is not
shown calling for

‘I.’1V1″e<– u§1'i'%.:*;i7ithout merit anri is accordingly'
rej¢c:ea.%%k&«%% %

'V …..

Judge

5313* x Z’