High Court Kerala High Court

Surya Aravindakshan vs State Of Kerala on 5 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Surya Aravindakshan vs State Of Kerala on 5 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32422 of 2006(I)


1. SURYA ARAVINDAKSHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,

3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAVEEN.T

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

 Dated :05/11/2008

 O R D E R
                            KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
                  -----------------------------------------
                       W.P(C) No. 32422 of 2006
                  -----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 5th day of November, 2008

                                 JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate
writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to report
all available and existing vacancies of Lecturers (Political
Science) in various Government Colleges, including one NJD
vacancy, to the 3rd respondent P.S.C. for advice and
appointment from Ext.P2 ranked list.

ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate
writ, direction or order declaring that the petitioner is entitled
to get advice and appointment as Lecturer (Political Science)
to the vacancies presently available in Government Colleges
on the basis of her inclusion in Ext.P2 ranked list.

There will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate

action in the matter, if not already taken, within a period of three

months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along

with a copy of the writ petition. On the respondents 1 and 2 reporting

the vacancies, the 3rd respondent shall take prompt action to issue

advice memo. It is also made clear that one month prior to the expiry

of the ranked list, the second respondent shall make a fresh

assessment regarding the vacancy position and the available vacancies

shall be reported to the 3rd respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

ahg.

OP NO. -:2:-

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

———————————–
W.P(C).No.32422 of 2006

———————————–

JUDGMENT

5th November, 2008