IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ITA.No. 381 of 2009()
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN.
... Petitioner
Vs
1. SRI.P.R.JAGADEESH,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN
Dated :07/09/2009
O R D E R
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal No.381 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
We do not find any substantial question of law arising from the
order of the Tribunal because Tribunal cancelled the unexplained
credits added in the assessment for the reason that the addition is just
based on the relationship between the assessee and the deposit holders
who are sisters, nieces, nephews etc. The Assessing Officer has not
chosen to issue notice to the persons who maintained the credits with
the Bank and without giving any opportunity to them to explain the
credits, the Assessing Officer made the addition in assessee’s
assessment only because of their relationship with the assessee. We do
2
not find any ground to deviate from the view taken by the Tribunal.
Consequently appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Judge
V.K.MOHANAN
Judge
pms