High Court Karnataka High Court

Sanaulla vs A Basavaraj on 7 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sanaulla vs A Basavaraj on 7 September, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan


§**§E€§M fiiifiififlfi” $3? %&@.§%§fi£17’f«£E”€fi Mifiw Qflfifim”

I» 1 -.~
31 TEE HIGH cum? 9? KARNATAKA gr aamnwkg
EATED mm mm ‘rm may (35? sEm*EmaE;§zga:o9
BEFGRE ‘ % 3 ‘

THE HORBLE mR.J::.rs’:f;<::E " ~ V.

BETWEEN:

samauzm
s;»::>.sIR1c;ExEKAs11usA3 *%
AGE 32YEARs ‘ % * ‘
R/AT NEW Ex’rI;Ns1AvANAGEEEkDIs1*RIc?’k x ., APPELLANT

(BY SR1. 2+5 &:.G 1§!AiimEVA I=RA.sA3;:>,

1 ii ‘mgsavamm
% RE swam?’ OF ANAED ‘F!;X’m.E
~ _I9fl’1;}LS I;1MITED,A M Bumnma
F 3 39m, mvaamaaaa.

INDIA ASWRAHCE

LIMITEIB
.–.R:.’.3.4″’16fi[ 1, NARASARAJ RGPJZ}
~ P? B 80. ea, QAVAHAGERE.
RESPSKEEHTS

(3? gm. vxsxwaxam 3 s1~m*2″rAR,a.m’ FQR R2}

I%§’A. FILEI3 UNDER SECTIQR 30(1) GF WC)RK%H

COMPEI’I&v’x’I’IGH ACT, AGAEIST TI-E J{§DGI9ENT AHD

Wm %«:%M”%.W€£%§ wwj’mmmmM¢m%M mmm mmmm rm” iM%.iz%§\§fia&?sMw% §v’t’m%%«§ m::mm* {W %&@W&”m§%§fi%

s
a. _ ‘

~-‘ -ea.-.;z-M _ V _
“W” m,4,_,,,

fiwfififi EIATEI) 31,’?.2{3fi4 Pfi..SSE§ E? WCAfCR~

J.D.ZL$.;’é?;9§ GK ‘rim ma arr TEE LABWE QFFICEE mm

COh&fl R’ ” FGR aw WQRKISQEFS CGBER 846111013,

g.§._é.§Q.4gQ§ ‘_ gfmm sgwegyL[>% ffi;3 %

Wwmmmm ‘$m>%d¥%€’fi9£x£ W mmmmmm mam WW”. W mma:ssw=;’§’mm w::~::~«; €Z;’€;.”3§§i§§”i?” W §%fZef9.-.%¥'<:¥¢£?;'§';%W% %»mf§»;§ e:%::t:i'%;;;e3%'i%''

.. 2 .»

DAVAKAGERE, EISIWSSNG THE {SLAM FETYTZQK FGR
COIve'fi7"ENSA'HON. 7

ms MFA came cm FOR '2':r-11$

mY,*r1–«m CGURT DELIVEREEE Tm FOLL€1*»'§£f,E_§'x*.§§ 1 %

J 2.: 3 cf2…M..E M M %

Heard both sides in J

by the clfit
Commiasimmr, ' "£':.-tar-' % Work1nm1's
Campefifion an the
grcamxi the driver of tha

am B.M.Sid:iappa far the
apmfiéxfité the ixasuranae palioy was in

in mmh bearing z»:o.m~:7;3a9a

Véffifiifi was insazarlwd in 2:11: awident, 'aha
'- ought fie have hm': allowed as the

di 'rim said which itwirg emplsayaci

the Era': xmponfimt, fimmfamg {km erésar sf the

gCc:::r1m:issicsr1ar requirw is 'm seat-asiciaa.

3. G2: the afim bani

Ccnnm},
Shri Vifihwazxafeh Sfihsm far rm imureanm mm§an’g

§uxfitEmta %z1$a§§ffimrmar&g afthixacaae

r\
E

-5 f

‘” 4. «:n\A’% \’rt»rm994£3″”\)\l’W»\.”‘l””£A If )6

“W” WW”W’W “Wm_-:WMWWM&M%M Wmvm ewmwm W» wm§m.mwa Wfifiefi €§§€’.I%&.§W§’ W? Kfi%§@Z§%%%?&§€£?«’3a §”‘*§§?&§*§ ififiifim” fig %a§WE”%§fi%fE’fi%%fis §”§§@§”% flfifiifim”

.. 3 ..

crmclesw that than chargmhmt was filed aghast 02;; Ali
whswa}ssaiadtabethe6rive1’oftheMmcicab

above and max the evidence at” the Cab 0’fi?’£1¢;’
aim in to the efiectt am; Ali wag ”
drrmg’ ‘ tha Mm’ b what: ma

such, dismissal 0f the c3a1m’ ééaag ” L’

4. Having thus gt perusal
zzf the mmrds of the ~ impufid
crdw mt only

mamlmat me vwchicie in
queefien I the vahicie uwnm
j ilommmaisner has
by 9133 mi arfi mt by
the Cammifisienw wmmitted us

V . .§ . m
% trgéappwx mm merit and £3 ammmaa.

Sd/-

JUDGE