Sursinh vs Union on 18 June, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/9452/1995	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9452 of 1995
 

 
=====================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=====================================================
 

SURSINH
AMARSINH RATHOD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
OF INDIA & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=====================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
MEHUL S SHAH for Petitioner(s) : 1,MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner(s)
: 1, 
MR SN SINHA for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR MG NAGARKAR for
Respondent(s) : 2, 
RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) :
3, 
===================================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 18/06/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

1. The
petitioner has challenged the petitioner has challenged the order of
removal from service.

2. In
view of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondents,
learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
present petition with a view to approach Chief Security Commissioner,
Mumbai with a mercy petition. Permission granted. Petition stands
disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged with no order as to
costs.

3. If
such a mercy petition is filed within one month form today, such
petition shall be decided within six months from the date of receipt
of such petition.

[K.S.

JHAVERI, J.]

ar

Top