High Court Kerala High Court

Hamed Mirzaman vs State Of Kerala on 27 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Hamed Mirzaman vs State Of Kerala on 27 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 684 of 2009()


1. HAMED MIRZAMAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.K.KUNHABDULLA

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :27/03/2009

 O R D E R
                      M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                 CRL.M.C. NO. 684 OF 2009
            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009.

                           O R D E R

This petition is filed with a prayer to quash all further

proceedings in Crime No.73/09. The petitioner herein is an

Afghan national. The offence alleged against him is that he

had changed the photograph in a passport, affixed his

photograph, used it and travelled and he was deported from

Colombo back to Nedumbassery thereby he has committed

offences u/Ss. 12(1)(b)(d) and (e) of the Passport Act as well

as Ss.468, 419 and 471 of IPC. The learned counsel would

contend that the cause of action had not arisen within the

limits of this country and therefore an action will not lie

within the limits of India. Admittedly this person had

boarded from Nedumbassery was caught hold only from

Colombo on the basis of a forged passport. He was deported

back to Nedumbassery wherein the authorities had taken a

case against him. S.12(b) and 12(d) of the Passport Act

deals with furnishing of false information as well as

Crl.M.C. 684 OF 2009
-:2:-

knowingly using a passport or travel document issued to

another person. Here the allegation is to the effect that he

had substituted the photograph of him in a Passport issued

to another person and had travelled. The materials regarding

the fact from where it was forged, how it was forged etc. are

all materials that require consideration at the stage of trial

when the evidence is taken. It is too early a stage now to

quash the complaint for the reason that the materials prima

face point out accusation of violation of provisions and

attracts the penal consequences of S.12(b) and (d) at least

of the Passport Act. Therefore this Crl.M.C is dismissed.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-