|-I
‘III \flJUI\I ‘If fill-E-KG-I
,,,o T ‘
M-F
1 THE n’|Ri¥:cr:§R1.”Nw1§R1’o
cEp:*rrmL._omcF, HUBLI REP. BY ITS
9:’;1s:9′:4p.L
_BELr3AuM.%%9Iv1sIoN,% % BE-LGAUM~ .
2 THE DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR _
‘~!NTERNAL’WSU.RRNC§E FUNB
KSRTC SHAIHTI-NAQAR, K.H.D_O_UBLE ROAD
CENTRALVDFFICES, BANGALORE 27 %
A!5PE’~–£A’NTS ARE’
” ‘V.PF.°ESE3§JTL'{ REP. 3′! ms ems? LA!!! 9. . game
% :§’;w;’x,R:’1*.§;’. ‘CENTRAL OFFICES HUBLI 30 ‘
(By { RAVI v I-IOSAMANI. ADV 1
Iluu. In… «:41: an nnnn.
: m
iviz’\Lr’\GO’u’D:’\ @ ?viAL’:..n’ PP}; DATPH ‘”””
AGED 30 YRS DRIVER _
R] O KALLOL TQ C’ TK’ “I, D””” BEL” ‘ Uivi
M
Rmsmnpnmi.
E0
MFA ii”ii..EB ms 173(1) 0}’ =.wr.A~;.fr;.;GA!
THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:28_,g.20 5 PAsé1+:D”
IN MVC 510.1942/2003 cm FELE * or-f
ADDL.CIV1L JUDGE {SR.DN.)_ & ‘A!3DL.MAC’_I”, . BELf_.§AU’M,
AWARDING COMPENSATION on RS-.22;€.mO-ié ‘W-iTi-‘1′-
.A.’!’ THE RATE oFAA6%% RA.” FROM A-TH’.E”DA’i’E our A
PETITION TILL THE DATE oF..PA.YMEN*r AND DIREUPING.
THE t’\’n’-‘PELLr’xN’I’S HEREIN THE. –
_A _-….. _.,…..
1 MALLAPPA__YAL=LAPP1§I5M1iRf§iii ‘: ”
AGED “AEi§)_UT 65 ms % ”
OC_C:AGRl_(1i_JLTURE,.
R,’ Q ;§\T~’POS’f ‘KALLOL
mg 1c=’.:1_1’K@p1_ D1_S'[_’_ BELGAUM
2 SIrIWEPPA’MfiLLAPPA UMARANI
«AGED 31
OGCAAAGRICULTU-RE
R] 0. #890 [GANDHINAGAR AT PD”T’ oi.
” TQ CHIKOD1 1:219!’ BELGAUM
M_A.LLA_PPA UMARAN1
._ ‘=._A(‘~’;ED’ 9.9 YRS
C-CCRGRICULTURE
RID #390 GANDHINAGAR AT POST KALLOL
..c:ni1<oDi ms? BELGAUM
A 4" BHARAT: PRAKASH SAGALGE
AGED 27 YRS HOUSEWIFE
RI 0 MAHISAL TQ MIRAJ DIST' SANGLI
M.".H.A.R!*.S'!'R.A. !-.-'.-'!'A'I'E
SHNAJ: SHANK.".R 3Ez~muR1<..A.s2
MAJOR BUSINESS RIO KALLOL TQ . V
Ci-HKKODi DES'? BELGAUM M
01
6 THE S-Efiioa DiV:sIoNAL MANAGER ..
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE C0.LTD.,_
MARUTI GALU EELGAUM
« /. an
Ly : SRINANDA PACHAPUR1i§3,V_’1’hI:’)V” 1. D , *
THIS 1~.-ma. FILED U} “i~’?3{1} ” D? N 1 AiE,1T”‘AC§AINST
THE JUDGMENT AND AwARD.DATED:2s.’s;éo0$ PASSED
iN Ivi’\r’C a’ViO.”27t’i’:3i’.«§;’fn’)3 THE 5%
ADDL.c1v1L JUDGE ._(sR.DN.), .&-«.ADfD.L.MACT. BELGAUM,
AWARDING COMPENS£i’Ti€W* C)i7=__ ~RS..i,6’2.(l)6i–
INTEREST AT THE RATE VQ1″?V_6’§(6 P.~A.’ ‘FROM THE DATE OF
PETITION TILL ‘rHE;DA’rn QF.PA”1’ME;l\!’T AND DIRECTING
THE AppE_eLA§§1?$ HEREIN TO Dmmsrr THE SAME.
trrHEsE ‘jg-NPPEALS;% DDMING oN FOR ADMISSION.
’13
{?§’)’fiRT…I}EL}’v”3RED THE FOL’.~”wING:
A. ~ J,’e_
These arise out of the common judgment and
D 28-05-2005 in M.v.c.No.1942 83 206912903 of
the ms. hieivn Judge (Sr.Dn) 85 Member. Add]. MACT.
ae1ga;.¢gfor short ‘MAC’l”).
2. The Managing Director. North–West=Karnataka Road
Transport Corporation. Belgaun; has preferred these appeals
calling in question the legality and validity of the findings
nworded by the MACT attzributing actionable negligence to
M
the driver of the passenger bus and the ‘def
compensation awarded to the injured – driver _
tmx (MVC No.1942[03) and the dependants’ V
Smt. Parubai(MVC No.2069/03).
3. Learned counsel for that
the MAC!’ fell in ermr meeeee of the
‘I’en1po–trax. while at Halalci
Cross, in a Iashisnd negligent noticing the
bus belongfinlgfito -11 t…..- ….L=:! l1igh’.=.*a_’,’,
e’a&”””t. nuuuxuing in
the of the Tempo-irax ought to
have more Vcz=,s__1eful*9nd cautious while driving at the
V. thrown all caution to wind. caused t
*th’e’»_addition, leamed counsel contends that the
ee;e.mum’teeeeeepeneaeen awarded by the mar is on the
V -V higher
~. Per contra. learned counsel for the claimants seek
ll to Sutain the impugned judsiment and awani as being well-
‘4 merited, fully justified and not calling fior interference. l J
U”\
U1
5. mime the the driver of fine»
examm’ ed as PW-2 while for hi ‘
examined as RW-1. The upeheehet
police documents Exhibits?’ F.i:i,1§. *P-fie the spot
panchanama. P-5 Inspector
to establish rneh ‘the bus belonging
to the to the claim for
‘ ….d .n”\….¢.:J:.._..4-“.’ the bmg.
‘ fir State Highway, wmeh was clear cf e…-my
mete: veiiicle. pmoeecied to cross the and having
_ _c1one…:io traversed a distance of 75% of the highway,_wi1enee
Vi “–.f1i:im the left side. the hue belonging to the appellant dniven
in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the hind lefl:
side of the Tempo-Irax causing the accident. In
contredisfinetion to this am} testimony. i§_._the evidence of
M
\
Ch
….’=1, the driver of the be who states tl’eat.–whe”t2’V:’he
reached the middie of the mad. ‘_:=aine’~gn .
the State Highway Even: the cross t
The evidence of RW-1 in the T »
thus: _ u A V
“At the it “about
75% efthe circle.”
7. does not dispute
the the bus in question was
on ‘ that of the Tempo-trrax, in its
seve1’ity;. Livctsteni side. To a question of this
,as place of impact on the highway,
e.._ 159. I3’…-
__J. _.____’.l:__’II__ 1.- 4. _’I___
S ‘1; peumcauy flu.-1’tf:_ the’: t”:itfit’:t. place
of imgaaeih’ fie that as it may. the fact that the vehieies were-
AA eatneged on the left side coupled with the etridence of we
= admission of the Drivers of the Vehicles. that the Tempe-
Trax crossed 75% of the State Highway and was on the edge
of the mad and the contents of the panchanama Exhibit P-2
disclosing damages to the vehicles. From thepmved facts. it
Wk
{J \
hibit P-2 the Ps.neh.=::-.ar~..a-
‘-I
is possibie to infer that the Tempo-irax d1’iven_”‘
crossed 75% of the mad, the state highway
belonging to the appellant d1’ivej.r_1…i.1_1_a “h1i;dV’.VI1c:E1i8€?31ut » _
manner dashed against the hintI’:.po1tieh
causing the accident. ‘l’his’V_i’s—p1ecie’e1’3V:rwhatrthev«–MAL’l’Vhaet’
done while moordingits oh__the ofinegligenoe.
No exception can be
8. Tim h4i.h.A.No.a416/2005
the driver” he awarded __Rs.22,O0O/3 as
it the nature of injuries
sustejned, of hosgyitalisation as
.2-. jur.ig.m.,.ezI.. a…d. nwmvi in
I …-….. .I..-…- .-..–..I
I3.-. £1(\
lW§dJ\II” [JG]. llflg
after deducting 1[‘3 towarcis personal expenses. the ivifiifi”
arrived at Rs. 1,200] – as the loss of monthly dependency and
It I
applying muitipiier 10, appliwblem age 69 mi’
of the deceased, awarded Rs.1,44.GGfl,’~ dc-f,
fl
dependency, to which was
expenses and Ra.5.000l- easihfor = L’
love and afiection and to to’
Rs.1,62.000[- with hitexfest the date
-1′ petition. 121; the evidence on
reefi-d. the dependants of the
deceased: be’ ‘Le.-.,eith:ei* e:_r:t_ra,-ordina11_qr._or on the
higher
The dapneall’ . merit and are accordingly.
amounts in deposit are directed to be