High Court Karnataka High Court

Hanumanthnagar Cable Network vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Hanumanthnagar Cable Network vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 March, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
IN um man court or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w.p.r:o.19¢53§or2oov
.1. . '

IN THE HIGH GOURT OF KARMA TARA AT  .
DATED THIS THE 1221*}: DAY or  %   

 

(By SRI. a MAHESHE Ms:  a.-  A. ) 

1

NOJ38. 2ND noon. 

SDFEET amp,   vk
BANGALORE.-so   E 

REP av rrs PARTNER sa:as,;x  %

AMI"! «
I I311! n

THE stars  
sew-?rAmAr        %
aaucmoaev    

REP av as cmar  
Eawéaimaé ELEc;~:rruasTY«;suFPLv co LTD
C{?»RPORATE QFFECE %

 cima 'A

 "

A 1. " 'THE-GENERKL' MANAGER rrscay

V .  .SL!PP!.-.Y 9!! L Q.

% . 

% % K§R.cIRC1Ll£_ 
 -- seoom.
THE Ci_-§i\iF<hflRN
~ s BANGALORE waman sumv a.  aomo

IHRLIR A I £2?

THE '!!'.lSPEGTGR %ENE.'¥=.L

 BANGALORE.
THE COMMISSIONER

IN THE 'HIGH COURT OF KARHATAKA AT  W.P.N0.1!_fl63 of



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. AT BIKNGALORE. W.P.N0. 19653 of 2007
.3-

BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BANQALQREE

7 THE CHAIRMAN

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

ROAD AND BRIDGES

BANGALORE. 

THE CGifiMiSSiGi~iER    R
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITT  E A '

D Ann A I ADC
uru 'I\3J'!I-\-ll u.»

G)

  

(EMT ASHA M. KUMEARAOERIMNTN HCG§"'F6:5§'R.T"fi.ND 5 ' '  
an ; N.K. GUPTA STANDING OOuN.sE--'. _AF'_PE€;RJNG_ f=ORR_-2 AND 3)

51$ 'i'.lIl"'

Ti-its  is Fififi  AjRTE:i.j"',»-5:  E 37
OONETTTDTTON OF TNON, ¥'RAY§NG T0,: OOAEH THE NTRUONED ORDER

DATED 2T.s.2D9T EEO  O »:eEOuENr.;E.  DATED N-..7.mT
UNDER ANNExuREE;p...AND.E. ' DJRECT RESPONEENTS-2 AND 3 NOT To
REMQVE THE OPTTO HBER <;0«.,BL..E5,ivEA"fliE;\.,£3(_34;-1)'.LAL QA.E3L_E$ SIRINQAMQ
ON THE POLES EREETED Ev  PETTTIONER AS WELL as
RESPONDENT "AETER; OB'I*;%«%N!N<39 RERNIETOON FOR WHICH REQWSITE

CHARGES RENO END -INACCORDANCE WITH AND AS PE
UNDERETANDTNO’ ON .2» REODLAR AS PER THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF «HE 1AOREz=.ENa,_;.NT;’ ,.–DlRECT THE R2 3. 3 NOT TO
INTERFERE IN =..THE PE.ACEFU,L ‘QPERATION OF THE PEl’!TlONER’S
EU:’:iii~iE:’:§S; RT NANDNRNTNANEOEE

“‘PL:Vl¢.\V I U? B I”l’\V-l’i£I.If’_ R 3 ..
2:51»: u”m-. \…-\.rmIr!I.\.’JI Gui §-GR PRELTEH’-INARY HEARING T?-‘HS DAY,

” THE OODRT NADE THE ‘ -LOWTNO:

:ORD ‘

:’T’hO:;’§e’tiiV’:ioner. assailing the correctness of the

order dated 27.6.2007 and its Oansequential

.1351.

DUTIES

{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ‘W.P.NO.l9653 moo?

t

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.P.NO.l9653 0f3007
a}-

to direct respondents-2 and 3 not to remove the

Fiber Cables and Go-axial Cable stringing on _

erected by me pefiofier ee we: as ‘efier 1’ V

obtaining due permission for Miich ‘er-e.”*

being paid in accordance it

. «V .

on e rw-..ier %ie ee p..r,.the end.ioo.n.d:iieee..ve. the

agreement and aieo to end 3 not to
interfere in the, iiejeoefiiiiii petitioner’s
business at vCebieV~ Network, No.138,
2″ .=::c«c.4.–i,’ii so ft. road,

2:» . |_ leerned counsel appearing for

o_neid ewe lengm of time;

course of his submission, ieameci

counsel appeoiriing for petitioner has submitted that, the

1’ineterit’_.writ..pefition filed by petitioner may be dismissed

._ gain-uitfiflrnutn raaanf 9 in I-ha nail-‘ ‘

nnnr in urn:-Irnnn
H’. T

1
ii “!UI.I’I\lI :”I’Il’ Ifiéfiili V FITI K’ ‘WI, KIIV W”‘l ‘ I ‘U Ifitllfifiil

V A iihieiigrievance before the respondents»-2 and 3, in the light

/_____.._.

IN THE HIGH COURT or xaamram AT BANGALORE \V.P.N0.l96v53 omov

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARINATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.P.N0. 19653 of N07
-4-

of ihe order passed by this Court in similar matters _on

aunth A… …A_…. nip

aapmmfiéf 23v: iii Irv.

Wire and Wireless (India) Ltd. and another,j§§.’V.: ~

State of Karnataka and others), 1* V’

m” n-“ions urgw. in this

4. The submission m§a’§~.by iéa_ifnei_fi.= cOU:fl’:”V;ii§:6i
appearing for petitioneif “as !_3’t§fI_e’:€i’:.f._-‘§”~\,’%f-Wffl is fiiaéed on

record.

is-d~~hv an .:o.nes :

fill

dismissed as iiwty to the =pfler

to redreés hisx Iihe respondants~2 and 3

in the iighini’ ifiaaaed by this Court on 26″‘

{.’u1.’s ‘u”u’Ir%

LV.’atfii’iMiré_l§as.i.V(in_dIa) Ltd. and another Vs. The state of

Ka.i’ai1i!:t«aliVa_i.’:§Ivi!it_,sii’1’¢v:iihers)vide Annexure-P, if so advised or

need arise. Grde.-red. eceerdingly.

I’ll,’
_____..____

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.19653 of2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA M’ BANGALORE. W.P.N0. 19653 OHM?
:

-.2-

Learned Government Pleadar is permitted to”.

meme at appearance fer ta-spgndenia-1 n-‘1 5i _

weeks from today.

Sri.N.KGupta, Standing

Vakalath for respondents-2 V

tcday.

E?

1!

IN THE HIGH comm or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N0.l96S3 otzoov