Pritam Singh Jubbal vs State Of Punjab on 26 February, 2009

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH.

                        CWP No. 7677 of 1989
                  Date of Decision: February 26, 2009

Pritam Singh Jubbal
                                                           ...Petitioner
                                Versus
State of Punjab
                                                         ...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR

Present:    Mr. Brijeshwar Singh, Advocate,
            for the petitioner.

            Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab,
            for the respondent.

1.    Whether Reporters of local papers may be
      allowed to see the judgment?
2.    To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in
      the Digest?

M.M. KUMAR, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ

petition has been rendered infructuous because it was directed against

order of transfer dated 24/29.5.1989 (P-2). After the order of transfer

was stayed, the petitioner has retired from service. Accordingly, the

request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and

the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

                                                   (M.M. KUMAR)
February 26, 2009                                      JUDGE
Pkapoor