.. n.r-uu1rur-Iru’| mun §,k’§JKl Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH COUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C
IN THE I-IEGI-I COURT {DF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE
RATED THIS THE 1193 DAY OF JULY 2008
BEFORE
‘rm HONBLE !u1r.JUS’I’ICE am J GIII3«é?’A!«{Tj V
BETWEEN :
Smt.ShasJ:n’lm1a,
W! at Vaarabhadmiah,
Ageds.bout.24-yeai.m, A ..
V
L VH3″; .,. _ . , &
far &sv.C’hik;1. Wefire
Hessian. .
2, mm --m}c.,m.~m, " * _ mu}: Gmce,
a.msEa,% .Se!ect==m’ Cammw ,
T&1ukP9..nc:hayat 0%,
ofKarna1;aka,
byita Secretary;
£’L.’=sc&1 We1£a:-a De
Vxlluana ,
‘-
5. Sn1t.Poor’r1ima,
W’! o Ravfixumar Dcshani,
Agw 2.5 years, _
Rla Jawaylfiohli,
Arsiimre Taluk, Hanan Iliatrict. …RESPOHI);ER-‘Tffii V’ ~.
(Sri H.T.Naz-wmdra Prasad, HCGP)
11$ ‘W? is filed undue: ArficI:eé”E26Aa;nd; 3_’2’?_:=f
Cinnstitutian of India pwaying oalifijr
leading ta rejawticsn Inf petifionm-*5 appFa;1m&x:z1;v_§;};1a:5h *
report seimsting the R5 viie ‘the
rwasprntlent in mmidm the c:a.’ss.=-,’i3fth.e
in the light at’ the above state:
ms wt? omnmg’ …. :m- A L’ this
day. the Ccaurt. 1
HCGP is
dxmcted’ :’*m~
mxmca-aim dated 21.06.2006,
izzviheai fax the past of Anganawadi
J are haued by the Govea-meat far
% Angannwadi Worlnen on 03.11.2001?
% A Les :2» decésion of this Court. Further
are ‘mined on 95.12.2007. The list of
candidatm of the Anganawadi Workers h
.._……… \JI” Mmmmm mu!-I couli? or KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA men c
publxsfi .T1wpet1no”nm*haafiledebject:xm’ tothesaid
– -vu I ‘Iu\ilJl\I \.I!
– n.Hlu’I.Hll-\l\H rm.-:I’-1 tA.§.3,lA.IK’I Of KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNIEAKA HIGH COUR? OF KARNATAKA i*IlGI-E COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C
aaiecfian List. The giwanoe ofthc petitioner ‘3 that she
was mt mfied for , inasmuch
endnmaezwt ‘3 iaauad, at copy at which is
Amman-B at S1.Ho.’?’l atatirlg that the
I-{awe am writ petition fin’ a
the aam;;a’ 11 of the fifth atOAmz.re-O % O
Learned apm petitioner
aumm that hzaazrxsach
as. hm’ No.5.
4;. mm HCGP submits
that si.:a;§ceL apfi not a:coompanmd’ by the
not cafied for interview and
cf fifth respcmdemt.
‘V V’ the madar%timt2e made by the
V .:’_4aa’:.11tI*§1nr&i.t:im ‘n that her apph:ca’ tion was not aocampamed’
the $81.6 mam card which is emmpulsory. Whang
{fl
up;-g .
_ _V_,._…’. .. .\…m.-mm mun count or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA men court? 05 KARNATAKA men c
the applicaiian itwfi’ in incomplete. the question of she
being-ralladfiarimerviewdoasnxat ar’mt’.~. Hence
camnot quesuian the: seluactim effifih r05P0&nt; ”
HE) merit. Pefition auandsrejacteii; ‘_
mmam pm, ma»
m file 2% of
mg-