IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CR. APP (DB) No.436 of 2006
RAISUDDIN
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
7. 7.10.2010 I.A.No.1859 of 2010
Heard counsel for the appellant
and counsel for the State.
Prayer for bail on behalf of the
appellant Raisuddin had earlier been
rejected by order dated 27.8.2007 on the
ground that he had been identified by two
witnesses in T.I. Parade.
Counsel for the appellant submits
that the appellant had been identified in
T.I. Parade by P.W.1 and P.W. 10. P.W. 10
in paragraph 8 of his deposition has
specifically admitted that the appellant is
known to him from before and, as such, no
value can be attached to the identification
of the appellant by him. Considering this
fact, the prayer for bail on behalf of the
appellant is allowed.
Let the appellant, namely,
Raisuddin be directed to be released,
during pendency of this appeal, on bail on
furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten
2
thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the
trial court, i.e., Additional Sessions
Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Kishanganj,
in Sessions Trial No.463 of 2005/ Tr.No.13
of 2005.
( Mridula Mishra, J.)
( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)
Kanth