High Court Kerala High Court

Suja K vs The District Educational Officer on 21 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Suja K vs The District Educational Officer on 21 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13764 of 2009(M)


1. SUJA K,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MANAGER

3. C.SUJITHKUMAR, RAMALAYAM

4. K.JEEJA, KAZHAKAPPARA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :21/05/2009

 O R D E R
                  T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               ---------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.13764 OF 2009
               ---------------------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009.


                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is a claimant under Rule 51A of Chapter XIV A of

Kerala Education Rules. Second respondent is the Manager.

Presently, the complaint raised by the petitioner is that ignoring

the petitioner’s claim, respondents 3 and 4 have been appointed

as UPSA in the School. Petitioner claims the benefit of Rule 51A

of Chapter XIV A of KER on the basis of the appointment by the

Manager on 23.08.2000. It is pointed out that going by

Exhibit P1, the said appointment has been approved by the

Educational Officer also. The petitioner was terminated from

service on 14.07.2005 for want of vacancy.

2. Apprehending that the Educational Officer will grant

approval without considering the claim of the petitioner, the

petitioner has already approached the District Educational Officer

by way of Exhibit P4 representation. Petitioner seeks for an early

disposal of Exhibit P4 in the light of the fact that the claim

survives even today.

W.P.(C) No.13764/09 2

There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider

Exhibit P4 with notice to respondents 2 to 4 while considering the

grant of approval of appointment of respondents 3 and 4.

Appropriate orders will be passed after hearing the respective

parties including the petitioner.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE

smp

W.P.(C) No.13764/09 3

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

W.P.(C) No.13764 OF 2009

J U D G M E N T

21.05.2009