WP 33787/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 041% DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR.JUS'i'ICE A;,s,pAcHHAP:i1§E""V
WRIT PETITION No.3378?/Qc7\iee';' (KL..R]'
BETWEEN
Sri.S.P.Prabhu,
S / 0.Pi11amarappa ,
Aged about 46 years,
Residirlg at N0.136;-- _ V
Somathhanahallyg' ' V1" --
Reddyhaily P0,=.=.t§., _ . .
Channarayap'afna*
Devanahally 'I'aVii1-l<:,1'.;__
Bangalore' Rura1i:Dis't'fi'et."' -- . E
[By sri.<f+'.s.Eati1,_ EAV§~1pr.3 " '
_ AND_;'
. _ SfaEe.._._of Karnataka,
'-- V ' =Depa1'f_men¥i_ of Revenue,
M."S.iB1,111d1ng.
. "'Dr.Amb§dkar Veedi.
"w..Bangaio~'re 560 001,
"Represented by its
AA _ Prlneipai Secretary.
Visweswaraiah Towers.
Dr.Ambedk.ar Veedi,
Bangalore 560 001.
. " -- . _.;1'}:1e Deputy Commissioner,
Bangalore Rurai District.
. PETITIONER/ S
2 WP 33787/ZOEO
3. The Tahsildar,
Devanahally Taiuk,
Devanahally,
Bangalore Rural District.
{By Sri.R.Omkumar, AGA]
**=i=*$
This Writ Petition is filedijunder f&.ftic!es
the Constitution of India prayin'g"i'eto't~direct"the"'respondents to
effect/ issue khatha of the land acres–.25V§guntas in
Sy.No.43 of SomathhanaiiaiiyVillaige, 04C-}iati11arayapatna Hobli,
Devanahally ‘i’a1uk,_ in fafvouir by considering
his representatio’i1js:VZ’– daitedg 03.08.2010 and
13.09.2010 a=:”x;tmé§m;;;§e’s respectively in pursuance
of the Saiguvfli’Ci*iit:’d:atedj’.V17V.'()5;20.1. oi
‘Fhis«WritVPetit’i’o«n on for preliminary hearing, this
day, the Court %rn.ade_t1V1’e_ foiicwingz
” ” V ‘0 omen
« , AGA is directed to take notice for Respondents 1
H H 0’ iearned ACA. /*
the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
3 WP 33787/2010
3. The Tahsildar — Respondent No.3 issued a Saguvali
Chit in favour of th.e petitioner in respect of the land
2 acres 25 guntas in S.No.-43 of Sornathhanahallyftfiliagevlpi”AfterC ~
the issuance of the Saguvali Ch_it,… the vinadef”
representations on 23-06-2010, 03–os¢2c=;10. Ltsd.i3{09;’:;[0A.1p0e::e;e
effect entry in the Record of:_ ¥~1ights””in’ purtsViiance_H0i3′
Saguvali Chit issued in his favour€°Desp_ite the represientations
made, Respondent No.3has not tai;en._Var1iyisteps to enter the
name of the petit.ionervA.inv.._the’ ‘is under these
circumstances” t.hat;the has ‘filed.
the petitioner has not
placed any lrriateriaffon show that the Saguvali Chit
has been issued in favour cfthe petitioner.
2,;-A11yA.hoW.,V «ii”‘”t”rie respondents have issued a Saguvali
Chits_iun_ the petitioner, it is necessary to make entries
in”th:e Recorfifof Rights on the basis of the Saguvaii Chit
Vi,ssued,*~if any. Under these circumstances, as there is a duty
iipon the respondents toconsider the representations, the
petition is allowed, directing Respondent No.3 to consider the
representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance
£7<
4 WP 33787/2010
with law urithin a period of four months from the date of
communication of this order.
6. Learned AGA is permitted to file Meme-.cA§f”ap15§§ara1§¢é–«..
w1’thin fifteen days.
JL