High Court Karnataka High Court

Kumari Sruthi K V vs The Registrar (Evaluation) on 4 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Kumari Sruthi K V vs The Registrar (Evaluation) on 4 November, 2010
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
1 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA!;D'RE

DATED THIS TH}: 04::-1 DAY OF NovDMBEB¢._2£5.'::i5"V;~ " 

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE' s'.AB.DDL nlxajzsjgg V  

WRIT PETITION No.33554 dI§2'o:"O (E:7Nf:.r«:s) ''  " ~_

BETWEEN 1

KUMAR1 SRUTHI KV _ ._ 5  " ~
D/O SR1. KPSREEDHARAN -   ;
AGED ABOUT19 YEARS D V  '
R/A KARIPPAL HOUSE   . 
UDINUR R0, '1'1?21--..AKARAPL:JR 

KASARGOD~6"iT'131}}' _ D "   PETITIONER

[By     

AND

1. THE REG'1S_'l'RAR ['x3V1?U,U.A'i'iON}
RAJIV GANDHI z;N1V*ERs1'1'1f..~*
OF HISALTH SCIENCES KARNATAKA
 SI'ITJATEf3 AT 4TH"'7I7ff__E3LOCK
'  JAYANAGAR'; .BANGALORE~5600()4

2.  PRINCIPAL .   
"r?R;- 'MUL1'_E;R_ HQMEOPATHIC
MEDICAL Co:.1,EGE
DERLA I:AT1fE'P.0,
; MANGALORE  RESPONDENTS

” Vg ys;-1 N K RAMESH, ADV. FOR R1
” . MNOTICE DISPENSED WITH]

D D THIS VVRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT

RI TO ISSUE MARKS CARD PER’FAIN}NG TO I YEAR BHMS

….2….

OF ANNUAL EXAMINATION HELD DURING DECEMBER 2009
AND SUPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION HELD DURING JUNE 2010
AND TO RECTEFY THE RESULTS ANNDUNCEDH IN [THE
INTERNET. * ..

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING oN FOR

DAY,THE COURTPASSEDTHE FOLLOWING:

The petitioner had _joine4cl._ the

college for the study of 15*» August, V

2008 for the acadeii:1icA_ It 4 years
course. She has appeysyifedy of the 15′

year BI-EMS coiijifise She has passed

in oneisuiojectl’liiiftmelyi-._ii-lomoeopathic materia Medica
and “failed in other 4 subjects.

The marl§:s.. o17’_1’f~’fl BHMS course is at Ar1neXure~

has ‘A “app.1..ied for the challenge valuation in

‘ respeC’t_:’0lf= failed subjects namely; ‘Organon of

ll/IediciI1c;.l’lli:Pflnciples Horn. Philosophy & Phychology.

‘Anatoitijgr’, ‘Physiology including Biochemistry’, and
A ‘lilolmoeopathy Pharmacy’. The University issued marks

list as per Armexure~D disclosing the result of the

challenge valuation. As per the marks list at

233′

rm’
.. 3 _.

Annexure-D. she has passed in the subjects ‘Organon of
Medicine, Principles Hom.Philosophy 81 Psycwh:o}_og_y’;
‘Physiology including Biochemistry’; and

Pharmacy’. She has failed in_,t.he_subjectitfrnatomyffll’

She has appeared for the suppletinentary

the month of June. 2010 failed

‘Anatomy’. The University Vi-s–su’ed’ “marks’list respect

of all the subjects as per’ As per the said
marks list._Vii_lqe in ‘Anatomy’ and
has failed~._in. subjvectpl “of Homoeopzafthic Materi

.)(- Cow’ec,w:9
1,/(Volt: O69»: – ‘ …. ..

‘>4′ _..ar.; ” — .;.,m;.W_;.W;;._ ”

O:9{£’9′ } CQQTQUQ Qiedica and Ther_apeu.ti’c~s_’) . Therefore, the petitioner has
2

‘air ~ iv t

3) respgo’nd.erit Uniyersity to issue correct marks list.

J Licigae .

filed yvzaitl petiton mandamus directing the 1st

._ Counsel for the petitioner submits that

of the marks list at Annexure ‘D’. the
Alpetitioner has joined 211″ year BHMS course in the

-l of August, 2010 and that she is pursuing the

V “course in the 2″” respondent college.

§
vi