High Court Kerala High Court

Rajukuttan vs State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rajukuttan vs State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7791 of 2010()


1. RAJUKUTTAN, S/O.NANU,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SREEKUMAR, S/O.GOPALAN,
3. VIJAYAN, S/O.BHASKARAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.THAMBAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :25/11/2010

 O R D E R
                       V.RAMKUMAR, J.
            ----------------------------------------------
            Bail Application No.7791 of 2010
           ------------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010

                              ORDER

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in

C.P.No.50 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of

the First Class-II, Mavelikkara, for offences punishable

under Sections 8(1), 8(2) and 55(a) of the Abkari Act,

seek anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the

petitioners in C.P.No.50 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate of the First Class-II, Mavelikkara, non-bailable

warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners.

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process

issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no

reason why the petitioners should not surrender before

the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the

petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an

application for regular bail within two weeks from today,

the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably

on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the

Bail Appln.No.7791/2010
: 2 :

pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the

petitioners and also after considering the explanation

offered by the petitioners for their previous non-

appearance, if any.

With the above observation this application is

disposed of.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

skj