Gujarat High Court High Court

Trent vs Union on 25 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Trent vs Union on 25 November, 2010
Author: Mr.S.J.Mukhopadhaya,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/12933/2010	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12933 of 2010
 

 
=================================================


 

TRENT
HYPERMARKET LIMITED & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
OF INDIA - THRO' SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & 3 -
Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
Mr
MIHIR JOSHI, SR. ADVOCATE for M/S WADIA GHANDY &CO for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
None for Respondent(s) : 1 -
4. 
=================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

Date
: 05/10/2010  
ORAL ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA)

Let
the matter be listed alongwith Special Civil Application No. 8032 of
2010 which is likely to be listed on 8th
October, 2010.

In
the meantime, the petitioners will serve an advance copy on the
learned counsel who generally appears on behalf of the Union of
India. Direct notice is also permitted on the 2nd
respondent.

The
question of issuing notice on the rest of the respondents will be
decided on the next date.

In
view of the fact that in a similar matter, the Delhi High Court has
passed interim order in WP (C) No. 3398 of 2010, by order dated
18.5.2010. for the same reason and ground, we also order that until
further orders, there shall be no recovery of service tax from the
petitioners in respect of renting of immovable property alone. In
the event the writ petition is dismissed, the liability to pay
service tax alongwith any other liability with interest will solely
be that of the petitioners.

[S.J.

MUKHOPADHAYA, CJ.]

[ANANT
S. DAVE, J.]

Sundar/*

   

Top