IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 8877 of 2006(F)
1. K. ANIL KUMAR, AGED 41 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB),
... Respondent
2. THE SALES TAX OFFICER,
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.N.PRABHAKARAN
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
Dated :10/11/2008
O R D E R
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
----------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.8877 of 2006
----------------------------------------------
Dated 10th November, 2008.
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition is filed mainly with the following
prayers :-
(i) To call for the records leading to Exts.P2 and P4
and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the
respondents 3 and 4 to enquire and investigate on Ext.P3 and
reasons for issuance of Exts.P2 and P4 to P10 to the petitioner.”
In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Sakiri
Vasu v. State of U.P. and Others (2008(2) KHC 13), it is for the
petitioner to approach the Magistrate of competent jurisdiction, in
which case, the investigation can be continued under the
supervision of the said court.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
tgs
KURIAN JOSEPH, J
———————————————-
W.P.(C) No.8877 of 2006
———————————————-
J U D G M E N T
Dated 10th November, 2008.