Sri Krishnakumar B A S/O Late B.V. … vs The Commissioner B M P on 12 December, 2008

 

IN THE HIGH COKERT 0;: KARNATAKA AT  J'  .A
DATED THIS THE 12m my 
BE:f9¥%g   I   ~  
THE HONBLE MR. JL:$3*fi:§::E 

WRIT PETITION NO;*'1.S525""'& j1_'$825 o§*2oo8 {LB-
      "  %

: SR1KRIS}{I~E}§riiJIv1.A£?B';.A  V V '
3/Q f;,A'I'If7 3 "*3?-A1;3HW5TH;'§N:%:RYAN. '
fi.GE£Z'«L:"$2 *5E;m2s" * ._  ._  
I2/r:i2...NO';12"    
hs:'UN1sv¢,s;:»§A?PLA GARQEN .
C'}€AM,!£R£:J?f'T"~ _   ' -
B5;-f§IGA_L.A.12
~ ?fifJ?§IS%',§:.MAPPA GARDEN
 ' ~ C}HAE\éijAR.»¢:J'*PET
 B;s:N§~§€:LiZ7jRvF;iE+6GQ18

ix.)

 PETI'I'EONERS IN
BOTH ?E'I'I'I'EC3NS

 .  " ' 43;; Sri 5 raf 'R RAJAGQPAL, ABVOCATE}

'  : ; ma COMMISSIQNER B M P

BANGALORE

Ix}

THE ASSISTANT EXECTUIVE ENGENEER
BBMP WARE} N849
BASA\iAN1'%.GUDI
B§sNff%AL(Z3RE--56G0}9
 RESSFCBNDENTS EN
EOTH ?'ETI'T'§ONS
{By Sté : I{.N,PUT'?EGOWEZ?A, AEEVOCATEJ

\"?.~--

 



 

 

"3
4:.

T§£ESE WPS. FELEQ UNEDEP.' ARTICLES 226 85-212'? GP' 'I'HE--. 
CiC3NST§TU"?i€3N OF INDIA PRAYING  'THE 
RESPONBENTS HEREIN TO   CON173IDERT"v 4_ 'I'}'iEERj
REPRESENTATEON AS PER ANNEX--?'_3, §-£HA£%§I}?_ 1'2?[."2._0Ge'3,.

2i.i1.20{}8 AN3 ZZ}.}1.2CvO8 AND DIRECT? _ .
TO EXTEND NECESSARY MD AND AS'E?aI'1"":NCE (£33: A DEPU'F'iN(fi

me 'Gr:")"R.POF2A'?iQN'v.

THE1R WORKERS EN EXECUTiE€G"i-'.HE WGRK IN TERI*%I_S"O.F "THE " L?

PERMISSION Aeeoemzo IN 'I'§~EE§,Lv£iiT'§'f:1Ii'"£)fE'§"~3ffJ.i0,2008 AS
PER' Aweexmi   '  

These writ. petifiens,  for pxelinaixlary
hearing, this clay, the  made__tf;e_»foiIeWing:

finotioe for respondent
No.2. A   '
2.    for the parties.

  of___t;he petitioners is that they are the

 o1§rfie1?e--.,§i:e 'possession of the property bearing New

1§a'o.'S4~]  12) situated at Muniswamappa

' . VGa1'd'en,   Chamaraj pet, Bangalore.

     representation made on 15.12.2007 and

 __"--«T«'--'s1:1bseAc;uent representations, the corporation passed

'4 for removal of the slabs and to put up steps.

Thereafter, when the petitioner attempted to do so, it
was amtated to by the neighbours. Hence present

%W

 



 

 

petition to direct respondents to  "  

representation and furtherr I-to"  

assistance in execufing the \sia'o1_'1§~--_Vi'n  ef 

permission accorded on  V . V

5. Sri.K.N.Puttegowda,*""ie§§Jeees:1._Aeotii1se1" for the
respondent submitteei # '   would
consider the, the petitioner
and in   30.10.2008 to the
extent: «      is permissible under

   the counsel, I am of the

  Vthai;it would be just and necessary to

 not only to consider the

 but also to ensure that the permission

 them on 30.10.2008 is duly complied with

   letter and spirit. The same having not been done as

  : detailed, and in View of the ineonvmfience being caused

Ito the petitioners and others, it would be just and

necessary to pass the follewingt

flm

 



 

 

ORDER

The wrif. petifien is

directed to censider the ‘daté§ 5_..12.2’

and 21.11.2003 and ru:n:h¢r}za exiend and k

assistance as mquirgti it?” ‘to (F§Xfi’Ci;t6 the
permission dated 30. corporation
themselves wjt;h§ :1–_- a fmm the date
of receipt (2332 ‘

Na; m:;s% ” A

Sd/-

Judge