Sri Narayanappa vs The Asst Commissioner on 30 September, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 

PRESENT

THE HON'BI,E MR. JUSTICE §(.O.SAEIIAI?:jI<If  4- _  "

AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTECE E;VI.V_NA.GAI2I§*If;II\IA u

MIsc.w”.No.1302L21/2.009 IN ‘ I
WRIT APPEALINO.fi1’78[2O09(SC/ST)

BETWEEN:

SR1NARAYANAPP:A._ _ _ –

S /O LATE CHIIIKIIMLINIVENIIATAPPA I
AGED ABOUT eQII.EARS._; .. .
R/O TIIII:>PASANDRA “II’II,I’,Ai;3E~~« 3
SHAPUR..PQ_S’T,_ I411;-I:IVfI:IURII_OI3’3III._.,.V,_
KOIIAR:VDISTF<1C., —

I ‘ …APPELLANT

[By Sri: P “EARAMESHWARAPPA &
B N MIINIRAJIIF, ADVS3.

V’ 1 n H ….. .. V

“COMMISSIONER

._ __SI}i3′–DIVISION
‘ KOLAR *

SMT; KENCHAMMA W/O N THIMMAIAII

.. , _ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
_ ‘R/O BANGAVADI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT

3. THE DEPUTY COMMESSIONER

KOLAR DISTRICT
KO LAR

… RESPOND ENTS

_2_.

{By Sri: D VIJAY KUMAR, AGA FOR SR1 SHNA PRAKASH
FOR R3 TO 5, R1 <3: R2~SD)

MISC.W.NO.13042/2009 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR APPELLANT U / S 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT PRAYING
TO CONDONE THE DELAY OF 375 DAYS IN FELING THE

This Misc.W coming on for Preiirninary

day, SABHAHIT J, made the following:

Misc. W. No.13o42/2009' is fiie_d:"for' coi'1_dpria1«ioii"'of'"

delay of 375 days in fiiing the appeeait.p

2. We have heard the ~1.earr1etd”C’o.iir1VVs\eE._ appeanxxgt for the

parties and ‘ pe1′”used* theppdaverinents made in the said

applicatiort”st1ppori:ed”§§yi.–t:he.Raifidavit.

3. uis=averred._.i:nV the appiication that the petitioner had

in 09 and when the same was disposed of with

iiberty to iiie tifreview petition. which was ordered to be

V _ considercid “or: merits within the period of limitation.

.. , ., fnThereafte1′,.. review petition was flied and the same came to be

O . di Sr’z1is’sed.

Having regard to the averments made in the

V application supported by the affidavit, which are not

eoritroverted, We hold that sufficient cause is made out for

m
:2 22

/

,3-

condoning the delay of 375 days in filing the application —

Misc.W.N’o.13042/2009.

5. Accordingly, Misc.W.No.1304_2,/V2009 K”

delay in filing the application is con’don:ed ;5:*..g5sc:;

of Rs.1,000/- to be depositeciiV_b–eafore Couft’ S3./it.’£1in..3fot.i1r

weeks.

« %I’udge

S3!