Sri : G. Gaoiiihgappa, Advocate) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 318? DAY OF AUGUST, BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUs31cEAAV'ARAL1--1v'm§g;RA;i " BETVVEEN2 I Munishamappa @ Venkafte;sh S/o Anjinsippa Aged about 35 years L' b _ ._ 12/ at Bijjavara . . Vijayapura Hob1i.__ ~ --_ Devanaha1liTa1uk VA Banga1oreRura1 Dietrietv __ Va Aged «abouitl._58 y-3:41:51" R/at B1'}javara"* » jj ' Vi3_ayap1j:-a1--:1Hgb15__" ' " 1 VDevar1aba11i 3Ta1L_1k ._ ' Bangalore Ruml Deistrficfi 2 Lakshniaiiifiia W/0 'V V. 3 Muniyappa 18/ o Anj'inappa, Aged about 38~ye'arsV " R/atE§i1]'avara ' * Vijay£;p~u;a;A Hobli ' aaaaa ~ " De'va_naha13i'I_'ah1k ' *Bar:ga}Qre. Ddistrict " APPELLANTS R. Girji, HCGP) " - of Karnataka " _byVVijayapura Police ' RESPONDENT
,¢……r”*~r~\..–
CRIMINAL APPEAL NoV.7815oo1«9 2ooS”*- 4′ 7
prosecution witnesses as to the alleged i11–treatrnent___ of the
deceased by the accused. besides being COntr3,1j?_::’t(:i’~~.th€
averments in Ex.P1 complaint, is not SuffiCie:ltgV.:£6′;fi;:i®d’.:’t«%j.Z1%f:
the accused committed the offencesbunde’r'”Sections v2}.q98.–eA
and 306 IPC and hence, the conviction. :of ‘eet]§l1ese’ actfU.seclt_’-
appellants for the said offences..cannot_ in *
7. While supporting _jud,<#i'I1ent and
order of conviction, Clrovernment
Pleader submitted that, ;:f1',"€ighbOuI"S of the
accused theV."'pz'o:secution case, the
evidences the complainant,
the accused and another
brotherol the -.is"snfficient to hold that the accused
Nos.e1_to $"~iIl_¥ireated'v_the deceased and consequently, she
cornrliittedsvi.suicide'""by consuming poison and hence, the
pl and order of conviction does not call for
an_;;}'i'r1te;?f'e:V:%e_:~[te in this appeal.
' V it is not in dispute that the deceased Smt.
it idle/lanjula, the younger sister of PW} complainant Mareppa
Axigasflmarried to accused No.1 and accused Nos.2 and 3 have
-<6