High Court Kerala High Court

C.K.Premsankar vs The Secretary on 30 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
C.K.Premsankar vs The Secretary on 30 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 28336 of 2010(N)


1. C.K.PREMSANKAR, COMPUTOR GRADE SENIOR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. K.G.MANOHARAN, READER GRADE-II,

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY, 9TH PAY REVISION
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS

3. THE DIRECTOR, PRINTING DEPARTMENT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :30/09/2010

 O R D E R
                            S. Siri Jagan, J.
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                     W.P(C) No. 28336 of 2010
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
            Dated this, the 30th day of September, 2010.

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are members of the Kerala Government Press

Subordinate Service. The service consists of 5 branches, namely,

composing, binding, printing, reading and computing sections.

According to them, an anomaly has crept in respect of employees of

the computing and reading sections in the matter of implementation

of the 8th Pay Commission, which anomaly was brought to the notice

of the Government. According to the petitioners, the Government had

directed that this matter can be brought to the notice of the next Pay

Commission. Therefore, they have filed Exts.P7 and P7(a)

representations before the 9th Pay Commission. The petitioners want

a direction to the Pay Commission to consider Exts.P7 and P7(a)

representations.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that it is too late

for the Commission to consider fresh representations in the matter

because the Pay Commission is in the process of preparing the report

and the report has to be submitted within a month. He would submit

that representations from associations and unions of employees are

being considered by the Commission and proceedings are in final

stage. According to him, if this Court now directs consideration of

individual representations, it would add to the burden of the

Commission, which cannot afford the same at this final stage.

I find considerable merit in the contention of the learned

Government Pleader. At this late stage, if I direct the Pay Commission

to consider further individual representations in the matter, it would

cause much inconvenience to the Commission and the submission of

the Pay Commission Report would also be considerably delayed. If

the petitioners have any grievance, they may approach the

W.P.C. No. 28336/2010 -: 2 :-

Government while the Government considers the recommendations of

the Commission for acceptance. With that liberty, this writ petition is

disposed of.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/

[TRUE COPY]

P.S TO JUDGE.