IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 30049 of 2010(E)
1. ANISHA ELDOSE,
... Petitioner
2. KAVITHA.V.,
3. NIVEA WILSON.,
4. NOORA RAHMAN K.V.,
5. QUEENCY DAVIS,
6. SAJITHA N.,
7. SARANNYA M.S.,
8. SHERIN JOSEPH,
9. SRUTHI.S.,
10. SWATHY GLYNE,
11. JISHA MOL B.S.,
12. LIMI VINCENT.,
13. NEETHU BINU.,
14. NIJI C.CHACKO,
15. TIJI THOMAS,
16. ARYA JOSEPH ALUVILA,
17. LIN MOL JUSTIN,
18. DHANYA T.P.,
19. VILAJA M.V.,
Vs
1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,
... Respondent
2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
For Petitioner :SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :30/09/2010
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.30049 OF 2010(E)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of September, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Petitioners are 2nd year students of B.Sc Nursing. When the
result of the Ist year examination was declared, petitioners 1 to
10 failed in the subject Physiology, 11th petitioner failed in the
subject Microbiology, petitioners 12 to 15 failed in the subject
Physiology and Microbiology, petitioners 16 and 17 failed in the
subjects Physiology, Nutrition and Biochemistry. The 18th
petitioner failed in Anatomy, Physiology and Microbiology and the
19 the petitioner failed in Physiology, Microbiology, Nutrition and
Biochemistry. They applied for revaluation and approached this
Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the
revaluation.
2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent University.
3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ
petition directing the University to complete the revaluation
sought for by the petitioners within 10 weeks of production of a
copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation
WPC.No.30049 /2010
:2 :
have been received and are otherwise in order.
Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the
2nd respondent for compliance.
(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/