IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
C.W.P NO. 3500 OF 2009
DECIDED ON : 05.03.2009
Dharam Pal Maddar
...Petitioner
versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Present : Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the
respondents to release the payment of Rs. 8,19,547/- along with
interest.
The petitioner is a Railway Contractor, who is stated to
have executed the works allotted to him by the respondent
authorities, within the stipulated period and to the satisfaction of
the authorities. However, the due payment is not being released
to the petitioner, despite a legal notice dated 07.02.2009
(Annexure P-1), served upon the respondents.
It appears that the petitioner is entitled to be paid
certain dues on account of the work executed by him. The said
payment, however, is not being released for one or the other
administrative reasons. However, no final view in relation thereto
can be expressed in the absence of the respondents to whom no
notice has been given.
C.W.P NO. 3500 OF 2009 -2-
In these circumstances, suffice to observe that
whatever amount the petitioner is found entitled to by the
respondents, there is no justification to withhold the same.
Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to the respondents to settle the petitioner’s account and
whatever is found due, release the same within a period of two
months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
As regards the petitioner’s claim for interest, the same
cannot be effectively decided in these proceedings and the
petitioner would be at liberty to recover the same, if so
admissible, as per law.
Disposed of.
MARCH 05, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE