IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated the SW day of March 2009 9
: B E F O R E :
THE I-1c-N'BLI.«:: MRJUSTICE ; " LT _
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL' No; .12 11.33: 12005 v{M\}'{;J
BETWEEN :
S.Shank:ar, '
Aged 33 years, S/o SQ1;na1*aj;...__
R/0 Paparpetty Viflag-E; 8:. P(.3st,. .
Pennagaram, Dhaxmapiiri' District, ' AA . 'V ,
Tami1Nadu State.
:4 ' ...Appe11ant
Advocate. )
AND]: """ 'V % A' V
1. Ltd,
Regional C)fi'i1c¢, ,. '
_No. 25, Shaxfiakazrafiarayaixa Building,
" _{ B/iL..(}.Ra;'ad_, VBan§;al0rc~ 1 ,
by itszMaI1 '
-. M{i'e1.j_t;'£', o Arunachala Modali,
Nc&3E3,~A, O16 Subramanya Swamy
' }§qil'Stz'eet, 89--A, Police Celony,
"i?§3pa1*patty, Dhaxmapuxi.
. . Respondents
( By Sri S.Narayana Murthy, Advocate for R— 1. )
Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under SC(.”Iti{)I1
173(1) cf the M.V.A<,:t against the judwent and award
dated 16.3.2005 passed in MVC N0. 4836/2002 on the
2
fiie of the X111 Addl. Smaii Causes Judge & Member,
MACE’, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore, (SCCH–1.3), partly
allowing the claim petition for eompensatio§1’~.._4d_e:1d
seeking enhancement of eempensation.
This appeai coming on V’
court delivered the following : _ 1
JUDgMEN$=
The compensation by the
MAC’? is called in -the ground that
the quantum is”-0;} under the
head ef because, the
disability at 10% instead
of atnount also requires to be
enhaneedeeizdeéf Ixeéids of future medical treatment,
v cotfiseysizee «z1o1.zrishment etc, as well as under the
‘ headof amenities of life.
£2. counsel for the appellant Shri
referring to the above heads, submitted
r}iat'” the medical evidence of the doeter examined as
d’ has (dearly put the disability at 30% for the whole
body, but the ‘I’ribu:r1a3 committed an exror in taking it at
%
towmris future medical expenses will not carry interest.
But, the rest will carry interest at 6%.
4. The impugled award is ” ..
allowing the appeal in part 3 ' A Iud'_iI3 ckc/---