IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bail Appl..No. 3046 of 2008()
1. K.P.SHAMSUDHEEN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. STATE,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
For Petitioner :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA
Dated :06/06/2008
O R D E R
K. HEMA, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B.A.No. 3046 of 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2008
O R D E R
Application for anticipatory bail.
2. According to the prosecution, the petitioner is the owner of the
motor vehicle, which was used by the other two accused for the purpose of
robbery, by snatching away gold chain. The petitioner is suspected in the
crime and the investigation is being conducted to the actual nature of his
involvement. Therefore, he has not been included as an accused in the array.
The incident occurred on 29-12-2007.
3. The application is opposed. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the petitioner is a porter and he has been using the motor
cycle at some point of time and he has no involvement in the offence. The
learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner is
also involved in the offence. Considering the nature of the offence and the
stage of investigation, I find it is not fit to grant anticipatory bail especially
since he is only a suspect and not an accused so far.
Hence, the application is dismissed.
K. HEMA,
JUDGE.
mn.