High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri G V Ramu vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri G V Ramu vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 July, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

.UUI(l' OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURTAAQF

4. am.  

  mgsmwaz nmmm.
1? 4- mi' am, H. BEVEHERAPPA mam. , mmmwmj

IN Tm; I-IIGH scum OF' Kamarraxa AT BANGAIQRE

mama ms 'rm 1 rm my 05' JULY    5   R 

BEFOE

'um Hmma Ii&}2.JUS'1'I{3E  

 

31%

I. SR1. C&.'if.RAHU
$10 G.E.V'ENKfi.

man   

2. am. ~ " O % 
we  r
  '

3. am.    R
3:0 mm. :w:m.rsw3mO 
' man  

  

 - O.g;g..g;.g3{'.yEmgqT '

I 3  .R$;,i:rR:1ro. 122,
12%? wmm; am awcx,

~ {S}   3HE'3."i'Y;-

O  _A(§E.';'1.ABOU'r4'4YEh%,

. , . .«gffi'i' NG.3069,  GERE,
PET'ITIONER:8



\/5-Ill! .,.- n:-uuwcnuuuu-\ ruuri uuuxl QEKARNATAKA HIGH COURT or-' KARNATAKA r-new COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

E2

1. THE STATE OF KARRATJKKA
BY H8Gfi13I RQFLI)
FTJI.-ICE S'1f.fi'I'IOfl,
BAHGELLORE.

2. am. 'If. smemfras @ Gmsm
W10 G.V.RAl!U,.
AGED ABOUT 28 YEAR6.
R; 0 31:31.9. ROAD,
BIUIBAGAL TALUK.

  ... L m:§séon:oEms
(spa. rmmwaz, mun. arr?" ':F§.317'. Rgsmmzm N9. 2)

-5-

1%: Crizz:ix';:a1aPa=:ti1:if:m Section. 482 of
Cr.P.C.     
by the 1* £645'-pC'¥f1?d'e"1:1'i..  V.  the III ACMM,
Baxlgalare in C.§.'§;'H::.   any othar order as

us" E2-1-Emma'   .3. an fiar admins' ism this
day, the 

   lodged by respondent Ro.2

aganz. L. * arm” Ha.I+21’%C)O5 ia registered
% ‘ , ff iéfaad Faiice Statziova under Section 4934; afIP(I.’.
‘ 3 and 4 c:fDawry Pmhibifion Act. U1tu:na’ my.

V new in (3.6. N::.1Cfi?’5)’200’7 hefixre
the m germ Court, Bangalona.

L»/7

RNATAKA HIGH COURT

uuxl Ur KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AAOEKARNATAKA HIGH COUR? OF KARNATAKA I-IGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KA

During the imagum, the 1-: pet’Ltior.Iat
the aompzamaa and the coznplamant (aw V
fikfi h€[.C$.Ha..1G59/2096 befm-ez ” k
Sectim 13-1: of Hindu Marriage :6:

. by mutual

24.11.2606. me said ma;1§f1:3moz;1aiVV’j§};i.sp1;te’.i:§r:aa…1D9:;c>h1ded
am mzwem dimmae is Court. The
copy cf the guaggmt 3g.¢..%%L@n;¢%¢.1e§;%1¢5912oos as
Pfiidumé at of
max-mml the 1% that
the 2==a to withdraw the case
End by and also fart dowry

the maintanance amount

back from hm’ husband. Thus it is

1 have oumgsx-ornisezi intnerse.

on the saié facm thh petiticm hr filed far

K/5