High Court Karnataka High Court

Siddappa Shidlingappa Walikar vs The Chief Secretary on 11 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Siddappa Shidlingappa Walikar vs The Chief Secretary on 11 July, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. %

CIRCTJTTBE}VCHATDI£4R}£iéfiv ° ” %

DATED THIS THE 21″‘ mssgf OF 2003’V%A 5: h

BEFORE %

THE H0N’3LE;11RJ{%,§rrc1.é.$

WRITI’..METTITI0LV2§§£i5§¥§’?§§0i94..’1;; _=
Between:

Aged about %12V«ys2a.rS;M.

Occ; agriczzlture, ._ .

Rfa Muchai<_hanr:1iT21luk', .5 ' % " _
Bagaikot District." _ ' V' Pefitécner.

Sri Siddappa sminggpgg @ f

(By Sri s.s.Ba;aggngam. 2%.;

I T333 Ch§'€f.S¢QAfe'€fily,
of
Vi-.ciha1';a' Saudha,
Q Bafigfiiézfe – 1.

» AA’1’he..’Ta1§’;silda:,

‘ Bagziikot Taluk,

Bagalket £)istrict. W. Respsndents.

. V V ‘ V – A K. Vidyavathi, HCGP)

‘wm

provisions of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes
of Transfer ofCe11:ain Lanés) Act, 1978 (fcsnshesrt .4 ‘V
Full Beneh eftlxis Court in the ease reponeixiin ‘I if

has held that the provisions ef the Ae”‘fivs i*1o£ a;:}§:Iie§1i:le..£03

the iands whose occupancy fights fiend
Tribune} under Section 48—AV of Reforms Act.
Thus, the endorsement at Amleiwée ‘VH.’_”»si_s_’ be the iaw

deciared by this d.eei;s2′.<§z2E

4. {:2 ihe,_resu1’£’, and it is accordingly

ailowed. ;fi1es_en<'14erse1;'1'e1 1't ei génnexure 'H' is hereby quashed.

VR1fiiIe aEt;scit;iu%,._No costs.

Sd/-'
Judge

V A % ':3z'siIs.=:«'.;:'i mass