Karnataka High Court
Sri Doddaramappa vs Sri Nagappa on 17 March, 2008
IN TH13 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN
mmn THIS TI-IE wk mm' or « u
1 sm
SIG mm'
AGED awn so *z1~'ea% V'
R10
*§I_r'g,L'r1g»'1~1'"a;Ia'\3L;*J_¥h'I?J£'r'lTi:I =
J. .l Ln.'-cat!" Jul i.I.v"uI-J.\x_
2
AGED %5%&'Rs
14:; 0% VHALGE
'fAt'.m'I'IVHDB L1,'~~--KAE)tJ1?
itA'fl'II"I"l' A fiflin 1.1.
' V 1'llJ'l.I1I.ll..ll.al"l us; 'In. -- 3i".nuv'.$f uiffi
% ASSOCIATES - ADV]
1 . SRI 'IiI'£'5.{"fl'ii"'?FL
L S)' 0 LATE C3-AHGAPPA
AGED AB-OU'1" an was
:2; Q B.*~m_u-.c-c.'.s:~1.r;a.A_1r~I.A_I-.I_A.1..I..1
v1LmE, YAGA11 HOBLI
.. . ......R'
cmczxnmemnn RESHJNDERT
REP. FEED U,' 5.1% QF CPL! .-.t£.}.A_T.!'IST TH..E-
JUDGMENT' AND DEGREE DT.20.Q.f2005 PASSED IN
R.A.ND.1l,F§fITK?- Gil" "l"P]".l'fi FILE GF T":-1".'E t'.":i'v".I.'I.. J'L.T""'E
lh/
[8R.DN] AND JMFC. KAJJUR, DIBMSBIRG THE
fungi'; :"*.r"1'ld"l:'."1"DI..I'l1Il' mm. _nn'~nuvmT g._]qL'1_ DEI__f';§§EE
m.4.1.m5E"'13?§sE6"I§ 3.'§'.§333;1; %
FILE 0? Tim Fm. cm: Jiimrs ['..iI"6and
acrein .'3y..No.5Bhaa falkmto theahare ofthaaplaintuf
andt1rtere:Lnai1:1ing2acruuinSy.No.56a;ml1a::nai::&
/.
\~\/
Sy.N<:-.5-8 has fallen to tho ahare of 1-1 son in
the plnint achacdub property; 2 acres has
1" dafimdant and remaining 2 acres
&*.%.'-.z!an:.; & aka 1 -N-* ---"1"=h'.'.':'-. - . -'ha. 'e"z.= T.
XMIHIII I-Iffldflnvb
rm mum of 1-2 and find uiong. pjninfifi
the brotttecm _
aharm.___, ° tinn before
'::F§= far _'¢E***'~F'*e.*~*¢f m'.'.1'*.a ....='- "w "ulvh'
= fi and his firut Ion
and dhpumd the name.
A ,- raj A j 5¢;%%m¢m-as this name ofdaiinndantl
L-HE -Luann» I u up an-up---u-~------_ ' .___...--............__
91' t__¢.:
I ncwnuvu
IINIIR-I-Iv'
' plum' ' tii'1"axu' in puruuanxae m':"i'us grant, p'mmr.u:r' T"""'i nnnnai
1mabem1n:1utataudintmrovenunreoorda,h¢hnnbeen
pa3'ir1gthatn:mIaz1dhahauprodunadtlmoriginn1g1'anE
/.
U4/
'ID
certificate which olmrly establishm the pla1ntiH'-{title to
the plmpaxfir, he has an exclusive title
Defendanlaa have no manrrer of
c'.-war '.5113 said ,".r::1.'a."t}'.
11. Two murts oral
and dmumentaxy in mind
the uattled hold that
piau'";t+?'u'I' hi .i'&fa<*'z=1i:*za _ Isun.1"""' ' ifi. Eawrai
ii entitled to an onlur of
who are ir1tecr'fem-lug
with ML maid findings are mad an
1.
5;: ;._.E __,_. in~Fi1-rrrih: fig gr
I’flnIIHJ%lGfl’If\vd-‘_VVul” —-u–cu)
. 1 F30 suhatantini quastion oi’ haw do arise’ for
w in this appeal which mam’ ad.m1nI’ ion.
appeal is dismissed at thus stag: of
L ‘V itself.
Sd/-
Judge