IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 34111 of 2008(J)
1. DAMODARAN GOPALAN, KOTTOORKKUNNEL
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SECRETARY, MANJALOOR GRAMA
... Respondent
2. T.L.GEORGE, THOTTUMARIKKAL HOUSE,
3. JIJI, S/O.JOSEPH, EDAPPAZHATHIL HOUSE,
4. LISSY JIJI, EDAPPAZHATHIL HOUSE,
For Petitioner :SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW
For Respondent :SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
Dated :09/01/2009
O R D E R
S. Siri Jagan, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W. P (C) No. 34111 of 2008
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 9th January, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has constructed a house. The petitioner has filed
Ext. P2 application before the 1st respondent for numbering the
building. The petitioner’s grievance is that the same is not being
considered. Apparently, the same is not being considered because of
a quarry operated by respondents 2 to 4 adjacent to petitioner’s
house. The petitioner has also got a case that Ext. P3 licence issued
to respondents 2 to 4 is illegal as the quarry is being operated very
near to the house of the petitioner within the prohibited distance. The
petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the 1st respondent
to consider and pass orders on Ext. P2 expeditiously.
2. I have heard counsel for the 1st respondent. Although,
notices were served on respondents 2 to 4, none appears for them.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ
petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass
orders on Ext. P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after
affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as
respondents 2 to 4.
S. Siri Jagan, Judge.
Tds/