High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Arokyanathan @ Suresh vs Sri M R Vijayakumar S/O Muthu on 9 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Arokyanathan @ Suresh vs Sri M R Vijayakumar S/O Muthu on 9 January, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
.. .iAfl1..'%. ID. . 3.

mi THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAAT
BANGALORE %  

DATED THIS THE 09"' DAY or  _  

BEFORE' §

THE H()N'BLE MR. JUSTICE iiULUV'.r$"I§i,C§.i§}&i:\«iESH   

MISCELLANEOUS §*1as*1′ }fi*PE;AVL; NQ3913 OF” %

Sri.Arokyan_athan @”Sur5sh ” .

s/oJ.A.se.1v:r::aj;

Aged 29″§*caré’_…’;’. ” Q »
R¢sidei2f§o1fNo.B%15,”‘5f_- é_

N!*J;,=St_aTi?f qamgm, .Kndiha}3é,

B;angalofe4:.’;.6Q_ 017;, . _’ WAPPELLANT

(By’srij.K.T.Gfir;aae§ , Adv.)

A A ” -. I.. S§’i.MIi?Z.__Vijaykumar, major,

* ._S£g; ‘I-‘aiutiiil, rio No.37,
M.S;Bt3i}din.g, Swagath main road,
Tiiaknagm, Bangalore»-560 011.

A. , “‘I”ize National Insurance Co. Ltd,

R.O.Madhura Cots Building,
M.G.Road, Bangalc-ra–560 001.

By its Manager. …RESP’0NDENTS

(By Sri.M.U.Poonac.ha, Adv R2)
w,,/- nun

This M.F.A. is filed under Section 173(1) ref M.V.A1″:t
against the judgment and awand dated 7.6.05 MVC
No.2I23f99 an the file of member, MACT, Mé}%é–Hsi}. Unit,
Court of Small Causes, Metropolitan area, Iféangsitjrsf

20), partly allowing the claim petition for”‘c91x:§)e1isatiu1i_ar:d

seeking enhancement of compensatipn.

This M.F.A. comingfiztz .’t}a§s:Vdsy,’:’§t:t§é C’curt
delivered the following:– t ” ”

JU Dmtis s

This appeal 1’t)y~.:_:tti§Aaé;’V~tiiaimant seeking for
enhanccn;ejé57′;:j.~§Sf’ not satisfied with the
award and Small Causes Judge,

Btanga;t.r¢tn jmzzg/99.

‘ ” 2..V15;:.;;_t§r€.’iingto..’the claimant on 6.6.99 around 12.15 pm.

road near Kedihaili when he was walking on the

driver of the car bearing No.KA05 A 5254 came

and negligent manner and dashed to the claimant due

AA to vszhich he fell dawn and sustained grievous injuries. Smting

that he was treated at Manipal Hospital and spent more than

Rs.30,000:’- towards medical sxpcnscs, the: claim petition was
l\5<""/

awarded (m that head. On the head of loss of filftzfe income
Rs.28,0(}0/- has been awarded. Acc0rdi;:g"*fig:…fi%i£=;_::A4i~eamed

Cmmscl far the appellant he has suffc-::'.e"a"'l–:_5.%: di$aljili*{y» llbagt

only 6% cf disability is takéa; by ale l'i*:_ib§:;i1sll'." llll3u: {a§ac V

remains that if he is \vdi¥:l§ig_in ti' eiltiiltlfl for
loss of earning to *-.sit_ l ll

Accordingly, appeal is allowed in part.

Sdl-1
Iudge