P Narayanappa vs Mulabagalappa on 5 January, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OFWKARRIATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 5?" DAY OF JANUARY..IZJOfiL:OE:4"V;~  
BEFORE  R' 

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICEN RAVI .:VlALI.I\%ivAT'H 
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL N'O.6:t6 GF_'200.;"" 
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.61? OF '2002=,  '

RSA.N0.616[2002:

BETvwEEC&t:'tAt'vT*E.V«fa " 

P.Naray_anappa.  V'
S/O.Putta'ppa V '_ . 
Agged about "60 'years',

F§/'at 3GVaCl,dekan'r1U--r««\2"E|iage,

 ,+<;'asaba Hotzii,

'  KO£ar'*v.,T a!_U4."r~.|.ai*aVyaf1appa

 S/o.PL:"tta;3pa
V. A 'Aged about 60 years,
 " R/at Gaddekannur Viiiage,
 Kasaba Hobli,
0 KOFBI' Taiuk 81 District. ...APPEE_LANT

(By Sri M.V.Seshac:haia, Advocate--absent)

fir"



AND:

1.

Smt.Pi|Iamma   

W/0 Hanumappa

Aged about 32 years,
R/at Karahalli Village,' 
Kolar Taluk & District. '

Sri Muniyappa C?" .].annag'at--ta'ppéz....

S/0 Venkataswa.=ria'*ppa_,  V.
Major,  = 2 '

R/at Ga<:Id.ekannVur\./iiiiage,   it 

Kasaba_..HQbi-5, J 
Koiar 'Taiu  D.is'tri£:_t.

. The J

i<o'i'ar TisIuiiii<

V  gJ'udg'~m'eri't and Decree dated
._'*RA.No";'90/29'8"on the fiie of the Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.),
rgK'0iar_,.alE.Qwing the appeal and setting aside the Judgment

 filed under section 100 CPC against the

19.3.2002 passed in

'and.-.Decr'ee dated 13.1.98 passed in O.S.No.19/94 on the

file Qftthe Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.{Dn.), Kolar.

These RSAS coming on for hearing this day, the

J "Cpurt delivered the foi|owing:~

Oflv.»--~--«



JUDGMENT

None appears for the ap;:eiia’r”1tg_’nor:ATV:a»njy:v”–7«’

representation is made, even though the émahtteer was_gr;al’Ee%:J A’

on two occasions.

Appeais are dismissed fo-r5n.o:*:.–Lp:»ose’Cijtiort1–.,

s Ki? ‘ = ”