High Court Kerala High Court

T.E. Thomas vs Raman Srivasthava on 4 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
T.E. Thomas vs Raman Srivasthava on 4 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con.Case(C).No. 957 of 2008(S)


1. T.E. THOMAS, S/O.T.V. ESTHAPPAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. A.X. VIRONY, W/O.T.E. THOMAS, AGED 51,

                        Vs



1. RAMAN SRIVASTHAVA, FATHER'S NAME AND
                       ...       Respondent

2. V.S. RAGHAVAN, FATHER'S NAME AND

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.C.ELDHO

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :04/08/2008

 O R D E R
                           R.BASANT, J.
                        ----------------------
               Cont.of Court Case.No.957 of 2008
                    ----------------------------------------
              Dated this the 4th day of August 2008

                               O R D E R

In this contempt petition, the petitioner complains that the

judgment dated 25/10/2006 in W.P.C.No.17965 of 2006 filed by

him and his wife jointly has not been complied so far by the

investigating officer .

2. Notice was given. A report has been filed by the

Dy.S.P, CBCID, Ernakulam who is investigating into the crime in

question.

3. In the report the investigating officer submits that

the investigation is now complete. Final report has already been

prepared. The same has been submitted to his superior for

approval and acceptance. Final report shall be filed before the

Executive Magistrate within a period of one month from today,

submits the learned Public Prosecutor. That submission may be

accepted and the contempt proceedings may be dropped, it is

submitted. The learned Public Prosecutor points out that in the

order passed in the writ petition, no specific time limit was

prescribed and the order was passed on 25/10/2006 for

C.O.C.No.957/2008 2

expeditious completion of investigation only. In compliance of

the said direction, CBCID has taken over the investigation on

01/01/2007. In these circumstances there is absolutely no wilful

disobedience in the order passed by this court in the writ

petition, submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. I accept the submissions of the learned Public

Prosecutor and I am satisfied that it is not necessary to continue

with this proceedings in contempt. I am satisfied that there can

be a direction to the investigating officer to file the final report

as undertaken by him before the Executive Magistrate within a

period of one month from this date. Copy of such report shall be

furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner within a

period of ten days of filing such report.

5. This contempt of court case is in these circumstances

closed with the above observations.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

C.O.C.No.957/2008 3

C.O.C.No.957/2008 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.C.No. of 2008

ORDER

09/07/2008