New India Assurance Co vs K Tamil Selvi on 4 August, 2008

HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGHA_C-OUR? OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (

3%; ‘?’ir§£ ‘駒_E{§E-J 3185.33’? 5}? TRI@m RT ERHQRLQKE
Efisffifi ‘TE-E38 TE-§E iii}? ER?’ :3? .’fi.%’.’,3i;’».§’t”.I£’I’ $333?

EEFQRE

?aE §S§*BLE fiR,Jfi$?E£E Afisaa a?RAR$$a£j,’?°

Easseziaagaas First agpea;.lug292§;2¢6§txvj”»=O

EE*E”‘§EE§*§ 2

%aw°xg£i3 Agguranaé Sgmgany _

Efififfifififitfifi by §aiy°s$fiStitutgQ’n_*\_ «__ O
figtwgnay, gig Eazar, Kfliag. 2’ *O4,;kAE?Eb&AfiT

53? 3ri*RaJaigraka3§gfAfifiv§at§§*n

Efifi :

2.K.?$mii $alyig7£fijé;V a.’
¥f$.3″Kumar, E{fi¢,;1é,’ _ _ O ” ;
§§sl§m EéQ£a,_K&r3m3fifia& E§$t;w_-”
gsfiugu V’

2,£a$:awa Raja;ffié}gE.4x

h,§.xriah§a§gsAg
;§.§g§ag§a;,§aj$:.

V”«§$t§{$:%O&§3i§ing at
‘.E¢$§u “igfiagafiahalli

R£%é£$3§fi§%§r§fibli
“fiaagargfifi fiaiuk,

3

é.§.x%&gé; Baaga Ha,33?

X.$;§,?gCa Qggmt

‘,§;§3r$s:aka 5$8t& Raafi
?§as3§¢§+ $@:g¢r&ti$§,

Vfiaxgai fiamumanthaiafi Rcafi
§&3§a;&s%~§? R£pr&3entefi

E? ‘%% fianagiag fiireatar.

Z

…RE$PfififiEfiTS

HKSH COURT OF KARNATAKA FHGH ACOQRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

tha amputatian cf the right arm sf the aggaiiant,

wfie is Etatafi ts have been wsrking,”a§, a

Sugarvisar ix 5 Garmeat Factary, the ?Eibgna£»iE_

mat gasiifiea in afiagiing taa Og%fi¢%n%$ge $52

éiasfiiéiqy 3: iéfié and tha ¢§i§ié$u¢fO:fié*m$fii;ai

gractitianar that thaz@_ ws§=Afiis3bi3it? :té:”€hé=

gates: sf 1Gfl% is alga *a£ra§aa&s_’a3s it is net

Efifififi uafier the egfiabiisfiefiafiséms tha£”l§s3 af an
arm, even hy virzua $5 $m§u€§§i¢&_§§uifl reauit in
iflfi fiisafiiiitya {&nfi§r.th§;E%rkmen Qamgensatian

Afit; t%$”3¢h§£fi;§flgfiéfigéifiing’tha garcantage cf

.Q%ynifiQ,f£3§&C§’Vfi§_f& werkman, avan if
cmfigfifiezefi.iéfillfiszfative, as gar Entsy III cf
?:rt if “¢fO’$tfi$d§ia E, %$ul§ indicate the

§§§:§nt&ge”&fO§i3§§iiity at ?§% afid tfierefsre, if

‘A;§£§'”§aRag 3% :ha b§nah$ark, tha ammunt af

‘~.c§%§§£S3t§§nx’ wmuié hava ta 5% cafisiderabiy

:%&m&§fi.%g§ therafaza, waulé gray that the ayyeal

“» 3% éigfiwaé mg thia limitaé grsund.

fin while {he caafifiai far th& rasganfient

“*fiui$ aubmit that the greaumgtiafi 5f the

m%§:%a$&§& af fiéaafiiiity under the ¥9§kmen’3

Z»

mun LUUKI ur auaumnnnum rum-1 Luwu or xAxNA:AKA nicer! mourn’ or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

£13§%i:i:§’ at E§Q%, avam if it results im 33
imhaiaafigf :3 mat, a grfiuaé .f%r interf$:en¢§ ,by

fihia ficurz.

3» Acagrfiimgiy, thg g§§§slAi£ fiiémfissédg

?, The afiawnt i§V_fia§¢$iE~ Es .&amifitafl “t¢>

:§% frihafisé .fa§ tka héaéfit §§_ tag @iaimant~

reagemfient. V2 ,_ 5 V- V».

“-fT “%%%37udge