IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MA No.500 of 2009
RAJESH KUMAR CHOUDHRY @ RAJU
Versus
SWATI DEVI @ PINKI
-----------
17 31-3-2011 From the submission advanced by the parties
and from perusal of order of the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Ist. Class, Samastipur dated 18-3-2011 in
G.R. 949/2001 as well as from a copy of deposition of
the informant of that case who is opposite party in the
present proceeding, it is evident that the o.p. has
expressed her wish not to prosecute the appellant and
the case has been fixed for further evidence on 5-4-
2011.
Since the informant does not want to
prosecute the appellant in view of her undertaking
before this Court and in view of terms of compromise
already recorded, it is expected that the court below
shall consider the issue of discharging the
accused/appellant under section 245 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure on the next date.
2
Put up under the same heading after two
weeks.
If cost is deposited, let this order be
communicated to the court of learned Judicial
Magistrate, Ist. Class, Samastipur in G.R.Case No.
949 of 2001 by fax.
( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)
Naresh ( Gopal Prasad,J)