Union vs Nayanaben on 7 July, 2011

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/24888/2005	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 24888 of
2005 
=========================================================

 

UNION
OF INDIA & 2 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

NAYANABEN
MAHESHBHAI LAD WD/O MAHESHBHAI D - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
AVANI S MEHTA for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 3. 
MR PH PATHAK for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 07/07/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)

1.
Learned counsel for the respondent states that the grievance of the
petitioner has been redressed by the respondents.

2. Though
board has been revised, counsel for the petitioner is not present.
However, in view of the fact as stated by respondent counsel, as
grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, this petition has
become infructuous. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.

[V.

M. SAHAI, J. ]

[G.

B. SHAH, J.]

Amit

Top